Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301479›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

LigB subunit vaccine confers sterile immunity against challenge in the hamster model of leptospirosis.

Neida L Conrad, Flávia W Cruz McBride, Jéssica D Souza, Marcelle M Silveira, Samuel Félix, Karla S Mendonça, Cleiton S Santos, Daniel A Athanazio, Marco A Medeiros, Mitermayer G Reis and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vaccination WithFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Vaccine potential of LenA and LcpA proteins ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Neida L ConradBiotechnology Unit, Technological Development Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Flávia W Cruz McBrideLife Science and Health Centre, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jéssica D SouzaBiotechnology Unit, Technological Development Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9076-452X
Marcelle M SilveiraBiotechnology Unit, Technological Development Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Samuel FélixFaculty of Veterinary Science, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Karla S MendonçaBiotechnology Unit, Technological Development Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Cleiton S SantosGonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Daniel A AthanazioFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Marco A MedeirosBio-Manguinhos, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mitermayer G ReisGonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Odir A DellagostinBiotechnology Unit, Technological Development Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2803-4088
Alan J A McBrideBiotechnology Unit, Technological Development Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9682-540X
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversidade Católica de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neglected tropical diseases, including zoonoses such as leptospirosis, have a major impact on rural and poor urban communities, particularly in developing countries. This has led to major investment in antipoverty vaccines that focus on diseases that influence public health and thereby productivity. While the true, global, impact of leptospirosis is unknown due to the lack of adequate laboratory diagnosis, the WHO estimates that incidence has doubled over the last 15 years to over 1 million cases that require hospitalization every year. Leptospirosis is caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. and is spread through direct contact with infected animals, their urine or contaminated water and soil. Inactivated leptospirosis vaccines, or bacterins, are approved in only a handful of countries due to the lack of heterologous protection (there are > 250 pathogenic Leptospira serovars) and the serious side-effects associated with vaccination. Currently, research has focused on recombinant vaccines, a possible solution to these problems. However, due to a lack of standardised animal models, rigorous statistical analysis and poor reproducibility, this approach has met with limited success. We evaluated a subunit vaccine preparation, based on a conserved region of the leptospiral immunoglobulin-like B protein (LigB(131-645)) and aluminium hydroxide (AH), in the hamster model of leptospirosis. The vaccine conferred significant protection (80.0-100%, P < 0.05) against mortality in vaccinated animals in seven independent experiments. The efficacy of the LigB(131-645)/AH vaccine ranged from 87.5-100% and we observed sterile immunity (87.5-100%) among the vaccinated survivors. Significant levels of IgM and IgG were induced among vaccinated animals, although they did not correlate with immunity. A mixed IgG1/IgG2 subclass profile was associated with the subunit vaccine, compared to the predominant IgG2 profile seen in bacterin vaccinated hamsters. These findings suggest that LigB(131-645) is a vaccine candidate against leptospirosis with potential ramifications to public and veterinary health.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesCricetinaeDisease Models, AnimalImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MLeptospiraLeptospirosisSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeVaccines, SubunitAdjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MLigB-m protein, Leptospira interrogansVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID28301479
PMCPMC5370146
OpenAlexW2595441060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.