Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301474›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Histidine-rich protein 2 (pfhrp2) and pfhrp3 gene deletions in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from select sites in Brazil and Bolivia.

Giselle Maria Rachid Viana, Sheila Akinyi Okoth, Luciana Silva-Flannery, Danielle Regina Lima Barbosa, Alexandre Macedo de Oliveira, Ira F Goldman, Lindsay C Morton, Curtis Huber, Arletta Anez, Ricardo Luiz Dantas Machado and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prevalence ofBulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Local variability inMalariaWorld journal · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High Frequency of Deletions in theTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  14. Aptamer-Based Technologies for Parasite Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Low frequency ofFrontiers in epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giselle Maria Rachid VianaInstituto Evandro Chagas - IEC/SVS/MS, Ananindeua, Pará, Brasil.
Sheila Akinyi OkothMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Luciana Silva-FlanneryMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Danielle Regina Lima BarbosaInstituto Evandro Chagas - IEC/SVS/MS, Ananindeua, Pará, Brasil.
Alexandre Macedo de OliveiraMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Ira F GoldmanMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Lindsay C MortonMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Curtis HuberMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Arletta AnezPan American Health Organization, La Paz, Bolivia.
Ricardo Luiz Dantas MachadoInstituto Evandro Chagas - IEC/SVS/MS, Ananindeua, Pará, Brasil.
Luís Marcelo Aranha CamargoICB5/USP e Faculdade São Lucas, Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brasil.
Suiane Costa Negreiros do ValleSecretaria Estadual de Saúde do Acre, Hemonúcleo Cruzeiro do Sul, Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre, Brasil.
Marinete Marins PóvoaInstituto Evandro Chagas - IEC/SVS/MS, Ananindeua, Pará, Brasil.
Venkatachalam UdhayakumarMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-3383
John W BarnwellMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USInstituto Evandro Chagas · BRFaculdade São Lucas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 80% of available malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are based on the detection of histidine-rich protein-2 (PfHRP2) for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Recent studies have shown the genes that code for this protein and its paralog, histidine-rich protein-3 (PfHRP3), are absent in parasites from the Peruvian Amazon Basin. Lack of PfHRP2 protein through deletion of the pfhrp2 gene leads to false-negative RDT results for P. falciparum. We have evaluated the extent of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions in a convenience sample of 198 isolates from six sites in three states across the Brazilian Amazon Basin (Acre, Rondonia and Para) and 25 isolates from two sites in Bolivia collected at different times between 2010 and 2012. Pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene and their flanking genes on chromosomes 7 and 13, respectively, were amplified from 198 blood specimens collected in Brazil. In Brazil, the isolates collected in Acre state, located in the western part of the Brazilian Amazon, had the highest percentage of deletions for pfhrp2 25 (31.2%) of 79, while among those collected in Rondonia, the prevalence of pfhrp2 gene deletion was only 3.3% (2 out of 60 patients). In isolates from Para state, all parasites were pfhrp2-positive. In contrast, we detected high proportions of isolates from all 3 states that were pfhrp3-negative ranging from 18.3% (11 out of 60 samples) to 50.9% (30 out of 59 samples). In Bolivia, only one of 25 samples (4%) tested had deleted pfhrp2 gene, while 68% (17 out of 25 samples) were pfhrp3-negative. Among the isolates tested, P. falciparum pfhrp2 gene deletions were present mainly in those from Acre State in the Brazilian Amazon. These results indicate it is important to reconsider the use of PfHRP2-based RDTs in the western region of the Brazilian Amazon and to implement appropriate surveillance systems to monitor pfhrp2 gene deletions in this and other parts of the Amazon region.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanBoliviaBrazilHumansMalaria, FalciparumPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntigens, ProtozoanHRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparumHRP3 protein, Plasmodium falciparumProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28301474
PMCPMC5354239
OpenAlexW2597115690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.