Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301288›Full record

ReviewTranscription2017

Transcription elongation.

Arkady Mustaev, Jeffrey Roberts, Max Gottesman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transcription, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biochemical characterization ofJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Structural advances in transcription elongation.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Autoregulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arkady Mustaeva PHRI Center, NJMS, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , Newark , NJ , USA.
Jeffrey Robertsb Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics , Cornell University , Ithaca , NY , USA.
Max Gottesmanc Department of Microbiology & Immunology , Columbia University Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USCornell University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

CONTROL OF TRANSCRIPTION TERMINATION IN E. COLIR01GM037219 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GOTTESMAN, MAX ELLIOT · 1986 to 2017
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is focused on recent progress in understanding how Escherichia coli RNAP polymerase translocates along the DNA template and the factors that affect this movement. We discuss the fundamental aspects of RNAP translocation, template signals that influence forward or backward movement, and host or phage factors that modulate translocation.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsTranscription Elongation, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli Proteinsbacteriophage transcription factorsGre A/BRNAP backtrackingtranscription-coupled repairtranscription elongation

Identifiers

PMID28301288
PMCPMC5501382
OpenAlexW4254071261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.