Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301279›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2017

Integrating Palliative Care Services in Ambulatory Oncology: An Application of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.

Sherri L Rauenzahn, Susanne Schmidt, Ifeoma O Aduba, Jessica T Jones, Nazneen Ali, Laura L Tenner

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Symptom burden among Northern Alberta radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer: mapping needs and gaps.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sherri L RauenzahnUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; and Cancer Therapy and Research Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Susanne SchmidtUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; and Cancer Therapy and Research Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Ifeoma O AdubaUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; and Cancer Therapy and Research Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Jessica T JonesUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; and Cancer Therapy and Research Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Nazneen AliUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; and Cancer Therapy and Research Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Laura L TennerUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; and Cancer Therapy and Research Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.

Funding

Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthKL2TR001118 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, DOUGHERTY, DONALD M · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthKL2TR000118 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A · 2012 to 2013
$757k
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthTL1TR001119 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, DOUGHERTY, DONALD M · 2013 to 2017
$640k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000118NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001118NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001119NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch in palliative care demonstrates improvements in overall survival, quality of life, symptom management, and reductions in the cost of care. Despite the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendation for early concurrent palliative care in patients with advanced cancer and high symptom burden, integrating palliative services is challenging. Our aims were to quantitatively describe the palliative referral rates and symptom burden in a South Texas cancer center and establish a palliative referral system by implementing the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).

methodsAs part of our Plan-Do-Study-Act process, all staff received an educational overview of the ESAS tool and consultation ordering process. The ESAS form was then implemented across five ambulatory oncology clinics to assess symptom burden and changes therein longitudinally. Referral rates and symptom assessment scores were tracked as metrics for quality improvement.

resultsOn average, one patient per month was referred before implementation of the intervention compared with 10 patients per month after implementation across all clinics. In five sample clinics, 607 patients completed the initial assessment, and 430 follow-up forms were collected over 5 months, resulting in a total of 1,037 scores collected in REDCap. The mean ESAS score for initial patient visits was 20.0 (standard deviation, 18.1), and referred patients had an initial mean score of 39.0 (standard deviation, 19.0).

conclusionThis project highlights the low palliative care consultation rate, high symptom burden of oncology patients, and underuse of services by oncologists despite improvements with the introduction of a symptom assessment form and referral system.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPalliative CareSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28301279
PMCPMC5455154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.