Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28301175›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of orthopsychiatry2017

Identifying variability in permanent supportive housing: A comparative effectiveness approach to measuring health outcomes.

Julia Dickson-Gomez, Katherine Quinn, Arturo Bendixen, Amy Johnson, Kelly Nowicki, Thant Ko Ko, Carol Galletly

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Housing and Cancer Care and Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Change in Housing Status among Homeless and Formerly Homeless Individuals in Quebec, Canada: A Profile Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Health-related quality of life and related factors among chronically homeless adults living in different permanent supportive housing models: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia Dickson-GomezCenter for AIDS Intervention Research.
Katherine QuinnCenter for AIDS Intervention Research.
Arturo BendixenCenter for Housing and Health.
Amy JohnsonAIDS Foundation of Chicago.
Kelly NowickiAIDS Foundation of Chicago.
Thant Ko KoInstitute for Public and Community Health, Medical College of Wisconsin.
Carol GalletlyCenter for AIDS Intervention Research.

Funding

QUANTITATIVE COREP30MH052776 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI MCAULIFFE, TIMOTHY L · 1994 to 2018
$33.2M
Comparison of supportive housing models for HIV+ and at-risk chronically homelessR01DA038085 · NIDA · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DICKSON-GOMEZ, JULIA B · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038085NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH052776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supportive housing has become the dominant model in the United States to provide housing to the chronically homeless and to improve their housing stability and health. Most supportive housing programs follow a "housing first" paradigm modeled after the Pathways to Housing program in New York City. However, components of housing first supportive housing models were poorly defined, and supportive models have varied considerably in their dissemination and implementation to other parts of the country. Recently, research has been conducted to determine the fidelity by which specific housing programs adhere to the Pathways Housing First model. However, evidence regarding which combination of components leads to better health outcomes for particular subpopulations is lacking. This article presents results from qualitative interviews with supportive housing providers in the Chicago, Illinois, metropolitan area. Supportive housing varied according to housing configuration (scattered-site vs. project-based) and service provision model (low-intensity case management, intensive case management and behavioral health), resulting in 6 basic types. Supportive housing programs also differed in services they provided in addition to case management and the extent to which they followed harm-reduction versus abstinence policies. Results showed advantages and disadvantages of each of the 6 basic types. Comparative effectiveness research may help identify which program components lead to better health outcomes among different subpopulations of homeless. Future longitudinal research will use the identified typology and other factors to compare the housing stability and health outcomes of supportive housing residents in programs that differ along these dimensions. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Comparative Effectiveness ResearchHealth ServicesIll-Housed PersonsProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationPublic HousingAttitude of Health PersonnelChicagoHumans

Identifiers

PMID28301175
PMCPMC5503781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.