Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28300204›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Non-invasive aerosol delivery and transport of gold nanoparticles to the brain.

Ramesh Raliya, Debajit Saha, Tandeep S Chadha, Baranidharan Raman, Pratim Biswas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Gold Nanoparticles in Neurological Diseases: A Review of Neuroprotection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent developments in the use of gold and silver nanoparticles in biomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nanomaterials-assisted thermally induced neuromodulation.Biomedical engineering letters · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ramesh RaliyaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Debajit SahaSystems Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Tandeep S ChadhaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Baranidharan RamanSystems Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Pratim BiswasSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.

Funding

Project 2 - Radiation-Induced Treatment of Multiple Myeloma using NanoparticlesU54CA199092 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ACHILEFU, SAMUEL, LANZA, GREGORY M · 2015 to 2019
$11.5M
NANOPHOTOSENSITIZERS FOR REGENERATIVE PHOTOTHERAPY OF TUMORSR01EB021048 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ACHILEFU, SAMUEL · 2015 to 2020
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA199092NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted delivery of nanoscale carriers containing packaged payloads to the central nervous system has potential use in many diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Moreover, understanding of the bio-interactions of the engineered nanoparticles used for tissue-specific delivery by non-invasive delivery approaches are also of paramount interest. Here, we have examined this issue systematically in a relatively simple invertebrate model using insects. We synthesized 5 nm, positively charged gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and targeted their delivery using the electrospray aerosol generator. Our results revealed that after the exposure of synthesized aerosol to the insect antenna, AuNPs reached the brain within an hour. Nanoparticle accumulation in the brain increased linearly with the exposure time. Notably, electrophysiological recordings from neurons in the insect brain several hours after exposure did not show any significant alterations in their spontaneous and odor-evoked spiking properties. Taken together, our findings reveal that aerosolized delivery of nanoparticles can be an effective non-invasive approach for delivering nanoparticles to the brain, and also presents an approach to monitor the short-term nano-biointeractions.

Indexed as

AerosolsAnimalsArthropod AntennaeBrainElectrophysiological PhenomenaGoldGrasshoppersMetal NanoparticlesOlfactory BulbTissue DistributionAerosolsGold

Identifiers

PMID28300204
PMCPMC5353651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.