Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28300190›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A mechanistic study of gold nanoparticle radiosensitisation using targeted microbeam irradiation.

Mihaela Ghita, Stephen J McMahon, Laura E Taggart, Karl T Butterworth, Giuseppe Schettino, Kevin M Prise

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biogenic ZnO-CuO Nanocomposites Synthesised UsingNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. YMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mihaela GhitaCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, BT7 9AE, Belfast, UK.
Stephen J McMahonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, BT7 9AE, Belfast, UK.
Laura E TaggartCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, BT7 9AE, Belfast, UK.
Karl T ButterworthCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, BT7 9AE, Belfast, UK.
Giuseppe SchettinoNational Physics Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, London, UK.
Kevin M PriseCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, BT7 9AE, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have been demonstrated as effective radiosensitizing agents in a range of preclinical models using broad field sources of various energies. This study aimed to distinguish between these mechanisms by applying subcellular targeting using a soft X-ray microbeam in combination with GNPs. DNA damage and repair kinetics were determined following nuclear and cytoplasmic irradiation using a soft X-ray (carbon K-shell, 278 eV) microbeam in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and AG01522 fibroblast cells with and without GNPs. To investigate the mechanism of the GNP induced radiosensitization, GNP-induced mitochondrial depolarisation was quantified by TMRE staining, and levels of DNA damage were compared in cells with depolarised and functional mitochondria. Differential effects were observed following radiation exposure between the two cell lines. These findings were validated 24 hours after removal of GNPs by flow cytometry analysis of mitochondrial depolarisation. This study provides further evidence that GNP radiosensitisation is mediated by mitochondrial function and it is the first report applying a soft X-ray microbeam to study the radiobiological effects of GNPs to enable the separation of physical and biological effects.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell NucleusDNA DamageGoldHumansKineticsMetal NanoparticlesMitochondriaRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsSubcellular FractionsTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1X-RaysGoldRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID28300190
PMCPMC5353761
OpenAlexW2594943982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.