Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28299724›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2017

Convection-Enhanced Delivery.

A M Mehta, A M Sonabend, J N Bruce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Protocols and safety profile of convection enhanced delivery in pediatric patients: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Systemic and local dysregulation of the complement system in glioma: a comprehensive systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Genetic therapies for neurological diseases.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A M MehtaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
A M SonabendDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
J N BruceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA. jnb2@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

CHRONIC CONVECTION ENHANCED DELIVERY (CED) OF TOPOTECAN FOR GLIOBLASTOMAR01CA161404 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRUCE, JEFFREY N · 2012 to 2017
$2.9M
TOP2A effects on transcription in gliomas: implications for personalized therapyDP5OD021356 · OD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SONABEND, ADAM M · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
The Brief Research in Aging and Interdisciplinary NeurosciencesT35AG044303 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Sachin Agarwal, Jennifer Jaie Manly · 2013 to 2026
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161404NIA NIH HHS T35 AG044303NIH HHS DP5 OD021356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a promising technique that generates a pressure gradient at the tip of an infusion catheter to deliver therapeutics directly through the interstitial spaces of the central nervous system. It addresses and offers solutions to many limitations of conventional techniques, allowing for delivery past the blood-brain barrier in a targeted and safe manner that can achieve therapeutic drug concentrations. CED is a broadly applicable technique that can be used to deliver a variety of therapeutic compounds for a diversity of diseases, including malignant gliomas, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. While a number of technological advances have been made since its development in the early 1990s, clinical trials with CED have been largely unsuccessful, and have illuminated a number of parameters that still need to be addressed for successful clinical application. This review addresses the physical principles behind CED, limitations in the technique, as well as means to overcome these limitations, clinical trials that have been performed, and future developments.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrain DiseasesBrain NeoplasmsCathetersClinical Trials as TopicConvectionDrug Delivery SystemsGliomaHumansParkinson DiseaseBlood–brain barrierCentral nervous systemConvection-enhanced deliveryDrug deliveryMalignant gliomasTechnique

Identifiers

PMID28299724
PMCPMC5398992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.