ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2017
Characterization of In Vivo Selected Bacteriophage for the Development of Novel Tumor-Targeting Agents with Specific Pharmacokinetics and Imaging Applications.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophage (phage) display technology is a powerful strategy for the identification of peptide-based tumor targeting agents for drug discovery. Phage selections performed in vitro often result in many phage clones/peptides with similar properties and often similar sequence. However, these phage and corresponding peptides are selected, validated, and characterized outside the complicated milieu of a living animal. Thus, there is no guarantee that peptides from in vitro selections will successfully meet the requirements of an in vivo targeting compound. In comparison, in vivo phage display selections have the distinct advantage of identifying phage clones with robust pharmacokinetics and tumor/tissue targeting ability. This capacity has allowed for the identification of peptides with specific in vivo localization and/or clearance profiles. However, in vivo phage display selections also have the potential to result in an array of phage clones with various and unknown targets and little to no sequence similarity. Given these shortcomings, we have developed methods to select phage peptide display libraries in living mice to identify phage (and corresponding synthesized peptides) with specific clearance and/or tumor-targeting propensity. Additionally, we describe the use of labeled phage clones for the efficient screening of selected phage/peptides to aid in the identification and characterization of a phage clone with an optimal and specific pharmacokinetic profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.