Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28299626›Full record

Trial reportMetabolic brain disease2017

Efficacy and safety of escitalopram in treatment of severe depression in Chinese population.

Tianmei Si, Gang Wang, Fude Yang, Yiru Fang, Maosheng Fang, Jijun Li, Jicheng Dong, Xinhua Shen, Jianmin Zhuo, Qing Rui and 2 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Metabolic brain disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tianmei SiNational Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital/ Institute of Mental Health) and the Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health (Peking University), Beijing, China.
Gang WangBeijing Anding Hospital of Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fude YangBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiru FangDivision of Mood Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Maosheng FangWuhan Mental Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Jijun LiNanjing Brain Hospital, Jiangsu, China.
Jicheng DongQingdao Mental Health Center, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xinhua ShenThe 3rd Hospital of Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jianmin ZhuoXi'an Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd, Beijing, China.
Qing RuiXi'an Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jinan WangXi'an Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd, Beijing, China.
Hu CuiliXi'an Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd, Beijing, China. chu9@its.jnj.com.
Beijing Anding Hospital · CNBeijing HuiLongGuan Hospital · CNNanjing Brain Hospital · CNPeking University Sixth Hospital · CNQingdao Mental Health Center · CNShanghai Mental Health Center · CNThird People's Hospital of Huzhou · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe depression accounts for one-third of depressed patients. Increasing severity of depression usually hinders patients from achieving remission. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in acute-phase treatment of severe major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 225 participants with severe MDD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition criteria), with a current depressive episode and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of ≥30 were enrolled. Participants received flexible dose escitalopram (10-20 mg/d) treatment for 8 weeks. Symptoms status was assessed by MADRS, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Quality of life was assessed by Short Form-12 (SF-12) and safety by adverse events, laboratory investigations, vital signs and physical findings. The remission (MADRS total score ≤ 10) rate in the intent-to-treat set (n = 207) was 72.9% at week 8. Significant improvement in symptoms compared to baseline, as evaluated by MADRS, HAMD-17 and HAMA scores at baseline, week 1, week 2, week 4, and week 8 (p < 0.0001 for all), was noted. Mean (SD) reduction from baseline in MADRS total score was 26.6 (11.38). Improvements in SF-12 score were significant (p = 0.000) and positively related to symptom improvement and negatively related to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs were reported in 28.38% of participants. Most common TEAEs (>4%) were somnolence (9.0%), nausea (7.7%), hyperhidrosis (4.5%), dry mouth and dizziness (4.1% each). No serious TEAEs were reported. Escitalopram was effective and well-tolerated for acute-phase treatment of severe depression in Chinese population.

Indexed as

Asian PeoplePopulation SurveillanceSeverity of Illness IndexAdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCitalopramDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCitalopramAcute treatmentChineseEscitalopramMajor depressive disorderSevere depression

Identifiers

PMID28299626
OpenAlexW2602334669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.