ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017
Cardiomyopathic Toxicity From Chemotherapy: Is There an Opportunity for Preemptive Intervention?
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency of Transition From Stage A to Stage B Heart Failure After Initiating Potentially Cardiotoxic Chemotherapy.JACC. Heart failure · 2018Article
- Breakthroughs in modern cancer therapy and elusive cardiotoxicity: Critical research-practice gaps, challenges, and insights.Medicinal research reviews · 2018Review
- Cardiotoxicity of Anticancer Therapeutics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThe fight against cancer has never appeared more optimistic with multiple ongoing advances in cancer therapeutics; however, the prevention of cardiotoxicity from these treatments, both old and new, is a major focus of recent research. We recommend conceptualizing the prevention of cardiotoxicity as binary whereby primary prevention involves a uniform application of preventative efforts to anyone receiving a potentially cardiotoxic drug and secondary prevention directed towards those with left ventricular dysfunction, whether symptomatic or not. Recent studies suggest that cardioprotective medications such as renin-angiotensin inhibitors and beta blockers, among others, may be beneficial in the primary prevention of cardiotoxicity. Importantly, the magnitude of this protective effect appears to be driven by baseline risk of cardiac disease. In terms of secondary prevention, we recommend that patients with symptomatic heart failure related to cancer treatment should be treated as aggressively as patients with heart failure from other causes, as indicated by the most recent guidelines. We identify a relative paucity of data to guide those with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. We summarize the literature to date with an emphasis on recent investigation and outline the importance of a continued partnership between cardiologists, oncologists, and primary care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.