Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28299514›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2017

Prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells and CXCR4 expression as biomarkers for a CXCR4 peptide antagonist in combination with carboplatin-etoposide in small cell lung cancer: exploratory analysis of a phase II study.

Ravi Salgia, R Waide Weaver, Michael McCleod, John R Stille, S Betty Yan, Stephanie Roberson, John Polzer, Amy Flynt, Eyas Raddad, Victoria L Peek and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Circulating tumour cells in patients with lung cancer universally indicate poor prognosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ravi SalgiaCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010-3000, USA. rsalgia@coh.org.
R Waide WeaverFlorida Cancer Specialists, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Michael McCleodFlorida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
John R StilleThe Chorus Group, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S Betty YanLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Stephanie RobersonThe Chorus Group, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
John PolzerThe Chorus Group, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Amy FlyntPharPoint Research Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
Eyas RaddadThe Chorus Group, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Victoria L PeekLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sameera R WijayawardanaLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Suzane L UmLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Steve GrossJanssen Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson Company, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Mark C ConnellyJanssen Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson Company, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Carrie MoranoJanssen Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson Company, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Madeline RepolletJanssen Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson Company, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Renouard SandersJanssen Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson Company, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Kurt BaetenJanssen Diagnostics, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
David D'HaeseJanssen Diagnostics, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
David R SpigelSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USJanssen (United States) · USFlorida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute · USJanssen (Belgium) · BECity of Hope · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USSarah Cannon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) expression in CTCs and tumor tissue were evaluated as prognostic or predictive markers of CXCR4 peptide antagonist LY2510924 plus carboplatin-etoposide (CE) versus CE in extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Methods This exploratory analysis of a phase II study evaluated CXCR4 expression in baseline tumor tissue and peripheral blood CTCs and in post-treatment CTCs. Optimum cutoff values were determined for CTC counts and CXCR4 expression in tumors and CTCs as predictors of survival outcome. Kaplan-Meier estimates and hazard ratios were used to determine biomarker prognostic and predictive values. Results There was weak positive correlation at baseline between CXCR4 expression in tumor tissue and CTCs. Optimum cutoff values were H-score ≥ 210 for CXCR4

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinCell CountDisease-Free SurvivalEtoposideHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsPeptides, CyclicPrognosisReceptors, CXCR4Small Cell Lung CarcinomaAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarboplatinCXCR4 protein, humanEtoposideLY2510924Peptides, CyclicReceptors, CXCR4Carboplatin-etoposideCirculating tumor cellsCXCR4 expressionLY2510924Small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID28299514
PMCPMC5418321
OpenAlexW2599170802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.