Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28299404›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2017

An intra- and interrater reliability and agreement study of vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and muscular endurance using a manometer.

Merete Kolberg Tennfjord, Marie Ellström Engh, Kari Bø

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05341024 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscles Training on Symptoms, Bother and Amount of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Female CrossFit and Functional Fitness Exercisers. An Assessor Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian School of Sport SciencesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled51ConditionsStress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Floor Disorders, Urinary IncontinenceArmsPelvic Floor Muscle Training in female CrossFit and functional fitness exercisers
NCT06786091 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Late Side-effects After Cervical Cancer Treatment - Prevention and Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Olavs HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsPelvic Floor Disorder, Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Female Sexual Dysfunction, Female Urinary IncontinenceArmsPelvic floor muscle training rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Assessment of Female Pelvic Floor Muscles: An Integrative Review.International journal of women's health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Merete Kolberg TennfjordDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, Ullevål stadion, 0806, Oslo, Norway. merete.kolberg@gmail.com.
Marie Ellström EnghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Kari BøDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, Ullevål stadion, 0806, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOAkershus University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisManometry is commonly used to assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. Aims of the study were to assess intra- and interrater reliability and agreement of vaginal resting pressure, PFM strength, and muscular endurance using a high-precision pressure transducer.

methodsA convenient sample of 23 women was included. The participants were tested twice by two examiners on day 1 and retested after 1 week by one examiner. Vaginal resting pressure, PFM strength, and muscular endurance were measured by manometer (Camtech AS). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze reliability and agreement respectively. Results are presented with mean differences (bias) and minimal detectable change.

resultsTwenty participants completed the tests (mean age 55.8 years [27-71], mean parity 1.7 [range 0-3], and mean body mass index 23.7 [range 18.4-27.2, SD 2.4]). ICC values were very good (ICC >0.90) for all measurements. Considerable intervariation of scores, and outliers were seen for measurements representing the highest values. Agreement with mean differences (bias) and minimal detectable change for the intrarater assessment was for vaginal resting pressure: -2.44 ± 8.7 cmH

conclusionsManometry (Camtech AS) seems less accurate for the strongest women. In clinical practice, significant improvement in PFM variables needs to exceed the minimal detectable change to be above the error of measurement.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthAdultAgedFemaleHumansManometryMiddle AgedMuscle Strength DynamometerPelvic FloorReproducibility of ResultsManometerMuscular endurancePelvic floorPelvic floor muscle strengthReliabilityVaginal resting pressure

Identifiers

PMID28299404
OpenAlexW2597582911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.