Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28299362›Full record

ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2015

The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. III. Variations in procedures.

Kay Elder, Martin H Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. IVF: The women who helped make it happen.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2019
    Article
  6. Honouring 'Patient 38' - a mother of all IVF mothers?Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kay ElderBourn Hall Clinic, Bourn, Cambridge CB23 2TN, UK.
Martin H JohnsonAnatomy School and Centre for Trophoblast Research, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.
Bourn Hall Clinic · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A survey is presented of the various technical and scientific challenges that had to be met during the 10-year period before the first successful live birth after IVF and embryo transfer was achieved, and the approaches used to meet these challenges is discussed. Records dated from January 1969 to July 1978 indicate that a minimum of 282 women were involved in 495 cycles scheduled for laparoscopic oocyte recovery, of which 457 cycles (92%) proceeded to attempted egg collection. A total of 1361 eggs were recovered over 388 cycles, of which 1237 (91%) are recorded as having been inseminated in 331 (85%) of these cycles. Approximately 221 embryos were described in 165 (43%) of the 388 cycles. A total of 112 embryo transfers were attempted, which resulted in five clinical pregnancies with two live births. This paper discusses the ways in which hormonal stimulation of follicle growth to the pre-ovulatory stage was varied, and the endocrine monitoring of these variations in blood, urine and follicular fluid, as well as their influence on egg recovery and fertilization rates. Variations in media composition and preparation are also described. It is concluded that, whilst driven by scientific reasoning, the approach adopted in trying to achieve successful IVF was empirical rather than evidence-driven.

Indexed as

blastocyst developmentearly pregnancyhuman embryo cultureluteal phase abnormalitiesnatural cyclespregnancy lossesstimulated follicular maturation

Identifiers

PMID28299362
PMCPMC5341287
OpenAlexW1878721787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.