ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2015
The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. II. The treatment cycles and their outcomes.
Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolution of In Vitro Fertilization Practices in Saudi Arabia: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2020Article
- Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2020Article
- IVF: The women who helped make it happen.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2019Article
- Honouring 'Patient 38' - a mother of all IVF mothers?Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2019Article
- Article
- The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. I. Introduction, materials and methods.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2015Article
- The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. IV. Ethical aspects.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2015Article
- The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. V. The role of Jean Purdy reassessed.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2015Article
- The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. III. Variations in procedures.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2015Article
- The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. VI. Sources of support and patterns of expenditure.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper reports on the numbers of treatment cycles involved in the development of IVF (1969-1978) and their outcomes. We show that between 1969 and 1978: (i) a minimum of 282 women were involved in 495 cycles of potential laparoscopic oocyte retrieval (LOR); (ii) of these cycles, 457/495 proceeded to LOR to attempt egg collection; (iii) of which an outcome was recorded in 436/457; (iv) eggs were recovered in 388/436 of these; (v) inseminations were recorded in 331/388; (vi) embryos were recorded in at least 167; (vii) a total of 112 embryo transfers were attempted; and (viii) a maximum of 11 possible biochemical/preclinical pregnancies plus five clinical pregnancies were observed; (ix) from which two healthy live births resulted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.