Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28299183›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2017

Challenges in microbiological diagnosis of invasive

Alexandre Alanio, Stéphane Bretagne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-invasive monitoring ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cross-sectional investigation of mycological diagnosis challenges in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Potential Antifungal Targets forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandre AlanioParasitology-Mycology Laboratory, Lariboisière Saint-Louis Fernand Widal hospitals, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, CNRS, Molecular Mycology Unit, Reference National Center of Invasive Mycoses and Antifungals, Paris, France.
Stéphane BretagneParasitology-Mycology Laboratory, Lariboisière Saint-Louis Fernand Widal hospitals, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, CNRS, Molecular Mycology Unit, Reference National Center of Invasive Mycoses and Antifungals, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-3800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) has been increasingly reported in populations other than the historical hematology patients and there are new questions about the performance of microbiological tools. Microscopy and culture have been completed by biomarkers, either antigens or DNA, and in blood or respiratory specimens or both. First studied in hematology, the antigen galactomannan performance in serum is low in other patient populations where the pathophysiology of the infection can be different and the prevalence of IA is much lower. DNA detection with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in blood or serum (or both) has reached a certain level of acceptance thanks to consensus methods based on real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). When used on respiratory specimens, galactomannan and qPCR depend on standardization of the sampling and the diverse mycological procedures. Thus, culture remains the main diagnostic criterion in critically ill patients. The current trend toward more effective anti-mold prophylaxis in hematology hampers the yield of a screening strategy, as is usually performed in hematology. Therefore, circulating biomarkers as confirmatory tests should be considered and their performance should be reappraised in each new setting. The use of azole prophylaxis also raises the issue of selecting azole-resistance

Indexed as

Aspergillosisat-risk patientsdiagnosisfungal identification

Identifiers

PMID28299183
PMCPMC5321116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.