Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28298947›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2017

Glomus vagale tumour, can it be diagnosed only on sonography?

Shuchi Bhatt, Pooja Verma, Neha Meena, Anupama Tandon, Nadeem Tanveer, Divya Bansal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shuchi BhattDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical sciences (University of Delhi) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095 India.
Pooja VermaDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical sciences (University of Delhi) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095 India.
Neha MeenaDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical sciences (University of Delhi) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095 India.
Anupama TandonDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical sciences (University of Delhi) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095 India.
Nadeem TanveerDepartment of Pathology, University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095 India.
Divya BansalDepartment of Pathology, University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi, 110095 India.
University of Delhi · INGuru Teg Bahadur Hospital · INUniversity College of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagal paragangliomas are rare benign tumors accounting for only 3% of head and neck paragangliomas and arise from vagal ganglions, predominately the nodose ganglion in the carotid sheath. Imaging plays an important role in their diagnosis, differentiation from more common lesions presenting in the carotid space, and management. MRI is the method of choice for investigation when paragangliomas are clinically suspected. The typical salt-and-pepper appearance in T1-weighted images is well known but not specific to paragangliomas. Demonstration of the continuity of the lesion with the vagus nerve on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) further asserts the diagnosis of glomus vagale. Although this tumor can be diagnosed on a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examination, it is limited by the non-demonstration of its neural origin. Sonography is considered only a preliminary investigation in patients, and a CECT and/or MRI study of the neck is conducted before treatment planning. This case is unique as a confident diagnosis of glomus vagale was made on high-resolution sonography of the neck. A middle-aged male patient presenting with a neck swelling was diagnosed with a glomus vagale tumor on USG by the direct demonstration of its continuity with the vagus nerve, and Doppler examination confirmed its vascularity. The diagnosis was confirmed on histopathology after surgical excision. The sonographic appearance, Doppler characteristics, and imaging differential diagnosis of glomus vagale are discussed in detail.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, DopplerDiagnosis, DifferentialGlomus TumorHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeckParaganglioma, Extra-AdrenalTomography, X-Ray ComputedVagus NerveDiagnosisDifferentialExtra-adrenalGlomus tumorParagangliomaTomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID28298947
PMCPMC5334275
OpenAlexW2576038147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.