Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28298878›Full record

Trial reportCanadian respiratory journal2017

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Thoracoscopic Lobectomy after Extubation.

Yuetian Yu, Xiaozhe Qian, Chunyan Liu, Cheng Zhu

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian respiratory journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05511636 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial To Compare The Outcome Of High Flow Oxygen Versus Conventional Oxygen In Extubated Patients After Lung Resection.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2019 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsPulmonary Resection, Oxygen TherapyArmsOxygen therapy
NCT05910788 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

High-Flow Nasal Catheter (HFNC) Compared With Conventional Oxygenation During the Perioperative Period of Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Rio Grande do SulRan2023 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsThoracic SurgeryArmshigh flow nasal cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Noninvasive respiratory support after extubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuetian YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaozhe QianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Chunyan LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Min Hang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Fu Dan University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng ZhuDepartment of Emergency, Rui Jin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-6740
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PneumonectomyChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialThoracoscopyOxygen

Identifiers

PMID28298878
PMCPMC5337350
OpenAlexW2589033211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.