Trial reportThe Journal of rheumatology2017
Proteomic Analysis of Sera from Individuals with Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis Reveals a Multianalyte Signature Associated with Clinical Improvement during Imatinib Mesylate Treatment.
Trial report in The Journal of rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase IIA Study of the Safety and Tolerability of the Use of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis
Phase IIA Study of the Safety and Tolerability of the Use of Nilotinib in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive modeling of cardiovascular risk in systemic sclerosis: a single-center retrospective study integrating clinical and imaging data.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Current Trends in Vascular Biomarkers for Systemic Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Perspective to precision medicine in scleroderma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Proteomic aptamer analysis reveals serum biomarkers associated with disease mechanisms and phenotypes of systemic sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Future Treatment Options in Systemic Sclerosis-Potential Targets and Ongoing Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Options for Systemic Sclerosis: Current and Future Perspectives in Tackling Immune-Mediated Fibrosis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Systematic Analysis of the Literature in Search of Defining Systemic Sclerosis Subsets.The Journal of rheumatology · 2021Article
- Drugs in phase I and phase II clinical trials for systemic sclerosis.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2020Review
- Unmet Needs in Systemic Sclerosis Understanding and Treatment: the Knowledge Gaps from a Scientist's, Clinician's, and Patient's Perspective.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018Review
- Targeting Costimulatory Pathways in Systemic Sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveImatinib has been investigated for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) because of its ability to inhibit the platelet-derived growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-β signaling pathways, which have been implicated in SSc pathogenesis. In a 12-month open-label clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), significant improvements in skin thickening were observed. Here, we report our analysis of sera collected during the clinical trial.
methodsWe measured the levels of 46 cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors in the sera of individuals with dcSSc using Luminex and ELISA. Autoantigen microarrays were used to measure immunoglobulin G reactivity to 28 autoantigens. Elastic net regularization was used to identify a signature that was predictive of clinical improvement (reduction in the modified Rodnan skin score ≥ 5) during treatment with imatinib. The signature was also tested using sera from a clinical trial of nilotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is structurally related to imatinib, in dcSSc.
resultsThe elastic net algorithm identified a signature, based on levels of CD40 ligand, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4 (CXCL4), and anti-PM/Scl-100, that was significantly higher in individuals who experienced clinical improvement than in those who did not (p = 0.0011). The signature was validated using samples from a clinical trial of nilotinib.
conclusionIdentification of patients with SSc with the greatest probability of benefit from treatment with imatinib has the potential to guide individualized treatment. Validation of the signature will require testing in randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00555581 and NCT01166139.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.