Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28298429›Full record

ArticleGenome research2017

Speciation network in Laurasiatheria: retrophylogenomic signals.

Liliya Doronina, Gennady Churakov, Andrej Kuritzin, Jingjing Shi, Robert Baertsch, Hiram Clawson, Jürgen Schmitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Liliya DoroninaInstitute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Gennady ChurakovInstitute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Andrej KuritzinDepartment of System Analysis, Saint Petersburg State Institute of Technology, 190013 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Jingjing ShiInstitute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Robert BaertschDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.
Hiram ClawsonDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.
Jürgen SchmitzInstitute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
University of Münster · DEUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USSt. Petersburg State Technological Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid species radiation due to adaptive changes or occupation of new ecospaces challenges our understanding of ancestral speciation and the relationships of modern species. At the molecular level, rapid radiation with successive speciations over short time periods-too short to fix polymorphic alleles-is described as incomplete lineage sorting. Incomplete lineage sorting leads to random fixation of genetic markers and hence, random signals of relationships in phylogenetic reconstructions. The situation is further complicated when you consider that the genome is a mosaic of ancestral and modern incompletely sorted sequence blocks that leads to reconstructed affiliations to one or the other relative, depending on the fixation of their shared ancestral polymorphic alleles. The laurasiatherian relationships among Chiroptera, Perissodactyla, Cetartiodactyla, and Carnivora present a prime example for such enigmatic affiliations. We performed whole-genome screenings for phylogenetically diagnostic retrotransposon insertions involving the representatives bat (Chiroptera), horse (Perissodactyla), cow (Cetartiodactyla), and dog (Carnivora), and extracted among 162,000 preselected cases 102 virtually homoplasy-free, phylogenetically informative retroelements to draw a complete picture of the highly complex evolutionary relations within Laurasiatheria. All possible evolutionary scenarios received considerable retrotransposon support, leaving us with a network of affiliations. However, the Cetartiodactyla-Carnivora relationship as well as the basal position of Chiroptera and an ancestral laurasiatherian hybridization process did exhibit some very clear, distinct signals. The significant accordance of retrotransposon presence/absence patterns and flanking nucleotide changes suggest an important influence of mosaic genome structures in the reconstruction of species histories.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationGenomePhylogenyRetroelementsAnimalsCattleChiropteraChromosome MappingDogsGenetic MarkersHorsesHybridization, GeneticMutagenesis, InsertionalSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareGenetic MarkersRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID28298429
PMCPMC5453332
OpenAlexW2605405505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.