Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28298351›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Community analysis of microbial sharing and specialization in a Costa Rican ant-plant-hemipteran symbiosis.

Elizabeth G Pringle, Corrie S Moreau

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Insights Into the Ecological Role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The interactions of ants with their biotic environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth G PringleDepartment of Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA epringle@unr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-9272
Corrie S MoreauDepartment of Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
Field Museum of Natural History · USSociety of Actuaries · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ants have long been renowned for their intimate mutualisms with trophobionts and plants and more recently appreciated for their widespread and diverse interactions with microbes. An open question in symbiosis research is the extent to which environmental influence, including the exchange of microbes between interacting macroorganisms, affects the composition and function of symbiotic microbial communities. Here we approached this question by investigating symbiosis within symbiosis. Ant-plant-hemipteran symbioses are hallmarks of tropical ecosystems that produce persistent close contact among the macroorganism partners, which then have substantial opportunity to exchange symbiotic microbes. We used metabarcoding and quantitative PCR to examine community structure of both bacteria and fungi in a Neotropical ant-plant-scale-insect symbiosis. Both phloem-feeding scale insects and honeydew-feeding ants make use of microbial symbionts to subsist on phloem-derived diets of suboptimal nutritional quality. Among the insects examined here,

Indexed as

BacteriaFungiPlantsSymbiosisAnimalsAntsCosta RicaHemipterabacteriaCordia alliodorafungimetabarcodingmyrmecophytescale insects

Identifiers

PMID28298351
PMCPMC5360929
OpenAlexW2619159402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.