Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28298224›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2017

Transcriptional reprogramming in yeast using dCas9 and combinatorial gRNA strategies.

Emil D Jensen, Raphael Ferreira, Tadas Jakočiūnas, Dushica Arsovska, Jie Zhang, Ling Ding, Justin D Smith, Florian David, Jens Nielsen, Michael K Jensen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advances in CRISPR/Cas9-Based Gene Editing in Filamentous Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recent Advances in CRISPR-Cas Technologies for Synthetic Biology.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Construction and Optimization of theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  18. Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Heterologous Host for Natural Products.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Emil D JensenThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Raphael FerreiraDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tadas JakočiūnasThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Dushica ArsovskaThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Jie ZhangThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Ling DingThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Justin D SmithDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Florian DavidDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jens NielsenThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Michael K JensenThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark. mije@biosustain.dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-4707
Jay D KeaslingThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Novo Nordisk Foundation · DKChalmers University of Technology · SELawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USNew York Genome Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscriptional reprogramming is a fundamental process of living cells in order to adapt to environmental and endogenous cues. In order to allow flexible and timely control over gene expression without the interference of native gene expression machinery, a large number of studies have focused on developing synthetic biology tools for orthogonal control of transcription. Most recently, the nuclease-deficient Cas9 (dCas9) has emerged as a flexible tool for controlling activation and repression of target genes, by the simple RNA-guided positioning of dCas9 in the vicinity of the target gene transcription start site.

resultsIn this study we compared two different systems of dCas9-mediated transcriptional reprogramming, and applied them to genes controlling two biosynthetic pathways for biobased production of isoprenoids and triacylglycerols (TAGs) in baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. By testing 101 guide-RNA (gRNA) structures on a total of 14 different yeast promoters, we identified the best-performing combinations based on reporter assays. Though a larger number of gRNA-promoter combinations do not perturb gene expression, some gRNAs support expression perturbations up to ~threefold. The best-performing gRNAs were used for single and multiplex reprogramming strategies for redirecting flux related to isoprenoid production and optimization of TAG profiles. From these studies, we identified both constitutive and inducible multiplex reprogramming strategies enabling significant changes in isoprenoid production and increases in TAG.

conclusionTaken together, we show similar performance for a constitutive and an inducible dCas9 approach, and identify multiplex gRNA designs that can significantly perturb isoprenoid production and TAG profiles in yeast without editing the genomic context of the target genes. We also identify a large number of gRNA positions in 14 native yeast target pomoters that do not affect expression, suggesting the need for further optimization of gRNA design tools and dCas9 engineering.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsTranscription, GeneticBiosynthetic PathwaysCRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSynthetic BiologyTerpenesTriglyceridesCRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTerpenesTriglyceridesdCas9gRNAIsoprenoidsMxi1scRNATranscriptional regulationTriacylglycerolsVPRYeast

Identifiers

PMID28298224
PMCPMC5353793
OpenAlexW2601924815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.