Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28298217›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2017

Large-scale gene network analysis reveals the significance of extracellular matrix pathway and homeobox genes in acute myeloid leukemia: an introduction to the Pigengene package and its applications.

Amir Foroushani, Rupesh Agrahari, Roderick Docking, Linda Chang, Gerben Duns, Monika Hudoba, Aly Karsan, Habil Zare

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CBNplot: Bayesian network plots for enrichment analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amir ForoushaniDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, USA.
Rupesh AgrahariDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, USA.
Roderick DockingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, Canada.
Linda ChangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, Canada.
Gerben DunsDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, Canada.
Monika HudobaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, Canada.
Aly KarsanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, Canada.
Habil ZareDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, USA. zare@txstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-6238
BC Cancer Agency · CATexas State University · USVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-133455CIHR MOP-97744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe distinct types of hematological malignancies have different biological mechanisms and prognoses. For instance, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is generally indolent and low risk; however, it may transform into acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which is much more aggressive.

methodsWe develop a novel network analysis approach that uses expression of eigengenes to delineate the biological differences between these two diseases.

resultsWe find that specific genes in the extracellular matrix pathway are underexpressed in AML. We validate this finding in three ways: (a) We train our model on a microarray dataset of 364 cases and test it on an RNA Seq dataset of 74 cases. Our model showed 95% sensitivity and 86% specificity in the training dataset and showed 98% sensitivity and 91% specificity in the test dataset. This confirms that the identified biological signatures are independent from the expression profiling technology and independent from the training dataset. (b) Immunocytochemistry confirms that MMP9, an exemplar protein in the extracellular matrix, is underexpressed in AML. (c) MMP9 is hypermethylated in the majority of AML cases (n=194, Welch's t-test p-value <10

conclusionsEigengenes define informative biological signatures that are robust with respect to expression profiling technology. These signatures provide valuable information about the underlying biology of diseases, and they are useful in predicting diagnosis and prognosis.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksExtracellular MatrixGene Expression ProfilingGenes, HomeoboxHomeodomain ProteinsHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyelodysplastic SyndromesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRisk FactorsSequence Analysis, RNAHomeodomain ProteinsHoxA proteinExtracellular matrixGene expressionHematological malignancyHomeoboxLeukemiaNetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID28298217
PMCPMC5353782
OpenAlexW2602321039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.