Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28298202›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2017

Evaluation of sublingual microcirculation in a paediatric intensive care unit: prospective observational study about its feasibility and utility.

Rafael González, Jorge López, Javier Urbano, María José Solana, Sarah Nicole Fernández, María José Santiago, Jesús López-Herce

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Relevance of Microvascular Flow Assessments in Critically Ill Neonates and Children: A Systematic Review.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. On Admission, Microcirculation Abnormality is an Independent Predictor of Sepsis and Sepsis-related Mortality: A Hospital-based Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael GonzálezPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, Madrid, 28009, Spain.
Jorge LópezPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, Madrid, 28009, Spain.
Javier UrbanoPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, Madrid, 28009, Spain.
María José SolanaPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, Madrid, 28009, Spain.
Sarah Nicole FernándezPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, Madrid, 28009, Spain.
María José SantiagoGregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, Madrid, 28009, Spain.
Jesús López-HercePaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Calle Doctor Castelo 47, Madrid, 28009, Spain. pielvi@hotmail.com.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESDevelopment Fund · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of the microcirculation in critically ill patients is usually done by means of indirect parameters. The aim of our study was to evaluate the functional state of the microcirculation by direct visualization of sublingual microcirculation using Sidestream Dark Field Imaging, to determine the correlation between these findings and other parameters that are commonly used in the clinical practice and to assess the applicability of the systematic use of this technique in critically ill children.

methodsA prospective observational study was carried out in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of a tertiary referral hospital. All patients admitted to the PICU during a three-month period were included in the study after obtaining the informed consent from the patient. Systematic evaluation of sublingual microcirculation was done in these patients (Total Vessel Density, Proportion of Perfused Vessels, Perfused Vessel Density, De Backer Score, Microvascular Flow Index, Heterogeneity Index) within the first day of admission (T

resultsOne hundred fine patients were included during the study period. Evaluation of the microcirculation was feasible in 18 patients (17.1%). 95.2% of them were intubated. The main reason for not evaluating microcirculation was the presence of respiratory difficulty or the absence of collaboration (95.1% on T

conclusionsSystematic evaluation of microcirculation in critically ill children is not feasible in the unstable critically ill patient, but it is feasible in stable critically ill children. Microcirculatory parameters show a moderate correlation with other parameters that are usually monitored in critically ill children.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, PediatricMicrocirculationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCritical CareCritical IllnessFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicMouth FloorProspective StudiesCritically ill childMicrocirculationMonitoringPaediatric intensive careShock

Identifiers

PMID28298202
PMCPMC5353860
OpenAlexW2601068087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.