Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28297654›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Role of Pore-Lining Residues in Defining the Rate of Water Conduction by Aquaporin-0.

Patrick O Saboe, Chiara Rapisarda, Shreyas Kaptan, Yu-Shan Hsiao, Samantha R Summers, Rita De Zorzi, Danijela Dukovski, Jiaheng Yu, Bert L de Groot, Manish Kumar and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multiple pore lining residues modulate water permeability of GlpF.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cooperativity and allostery in aquaporin 0 regulation by CaBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick O SaboeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Chiara RapisardaDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shreyas KaptanComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Yu-Shan HsiaoDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Samantha R SummersDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Rita De ZorziDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Danijela DukovskiDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jiaheng YuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Bert L de GrootComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Manish KumarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: manish.kumar@psu.edu.
Thomas WalzDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: twalz@mail.rockefeller.edu.
Harvard University · USPennsylvania State University · USMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

Structure and Function of Lens Membrane ProteinsR01EY015107 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALZ, THOMAS · 2004 to 2011
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to other aquaporins (AQPs), lens-specific AQP0 is a poor water channel, and its permeability was reported to be pH-dependent. To date, most water conduction studies on AQP0 were performed on protein expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and the results may therefore also reflect effects introduced by the oocytes themselves. Experiments with purified AQP0 reconstituted into liposomes are challenging because the water permeability of AQP0 is only slightly higher than that of pure lipid bilayers. By reconstituting high amounts of AQP0 and using high concentrations of cholesterol to reduce the permeability of the lipid bilayer, we improved the signal-to-noise ratio of water permeability measurements on AQP0 proteoliposomes. Our measurements show that mutation of two pore-lining tyrosine residues, Tyr-23 and Tyr-149 in sheep AQP0, to the corresponding residues in the high-permeability water channel AQP1 have additive effects and together increase the water permeability of AQP0 40-fold to a level comparable to that of AQP1. Molecular dynamics simulations qualitatively support these experimental findings and suggest that mutation of Tyr-23 changes the pore profile at the gate formed by residue Arg-187.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquaporinsBiological TransportEye ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationPermeabilityPorosityProtein ConformationProtein StabilitySheepWateraquaporin 0AquaporinsEye ProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID28297654
PMCPMC5355496
OpenAlexW2600824575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.