Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28297195›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2017

Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Aspects of Bispecific Antibodies.

A Trivedi, S Stienen, M Zhu, H Li, T Yuraszeck, J Gibbs, T Heath, R Loberg, S Kasichayanula

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient-Specific Targeting of the T-Cell Receptor Variable Region as a Therapeutic Strategy in Clonal T-Cell Diseases.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Occupational Exposure Risks When Working with Protein Therapeutics and the Development of a Biologics Banding System.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Bioassay Development for Bispecific Antibodies-Challenges and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A TrivediAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
S StienenAmgen Research (Munich), Munich, Germany.
M ZhuAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
H LiAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
T YuraszeckAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
J GibbsAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
T HeathAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
R LobergAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
S KasichayanulaAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BispecificDrug DevelopmentHumansPatient SafetyRisk AssessmentTranslational Research, BiomedicalAntibodies, Bispecific

Identifiers

PMID28297195
PMCPMC5421745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.