Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28296953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A numerical investigation of intrathecal isobaric drug dispersion within the cervical subarachnoid space.

Per Thomas Haga, Giulia Pizzichelli, Mikael Mortensen, Miroslav Kuchta, Soroush Heidari Pahlavian, Edoardo Sinibaldi, Bryn A Martin, Kent-Andre Mardal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Magnetically Guided Microcatheter for Targeted Injection of Magnetic Particle Swarms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Per Thomas HagaCenter for Biomedical Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Fornebu, Norway.
Giulia PizzichelliIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Center for Micro-BioRobotics, Pontedera, Italy.
Mikael MortensenCenter for Biomedical Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Fornebu, Norway.
Miroslav KuchtaDept. of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Soroush Heidari PahlavianConquer Chiari Research Center, Dept. of Mech. Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America.
Edoardo SinibaldiIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Center for Micro-BioRobotics, Pontedera, Italy.
Bryn A MartinDept. of Biological Engineering, The University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.
Kent-Andre MardalCenter for Biomedical Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Fornebu, Norway.
Simula Research Laboratory · NOCenter for Micro-BioRobotics · ITUniversity of Akron · USUniversity of Idaho · USUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Kenneth A Cornell · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrathecal drug and gene vector delivery is a procedure to release a solute within the cerebrospinal fluid. This procedure is currently used in clinical practice and shows promise for treatment of several central nervous system pathologies. However, intrathecal delivery protocols and systems are not yet optimized. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of injection parameters on solute distribution within the cervical subarachnoid space using a numerical platform. We developed a numerical model based on a patient-specific three dimensional geometry of the cervical subarachnoid space with idealized dorsal and ventral nerve roots and denticulate ligament anatomy. We considered the drug as massless particles within the flow field and with similar properties as the CSF, and we analyzed the effects of anatomy, catheter position, angle and injection flow rate on solute distribution within the cerebrospinal fluid by performing a series of numerical simulations. Results were compared quantitatively in terms of drug peak concentration, spread, accumulation rate and appearance instant over 15 seconds following the injection. Results indicated that solute distribution within the cervical spine was altered by all parameters investigated within the time range analyzed following the injection. The presence of spinal cord nerve roots and denticulate ligaments increased drug spread by 60% compared to simulations without these anatomical features. Catheter position and angle were both found to alter spread rate up to 86%, and catheter flow rate altered drug peak concentration up to 78%. The presented numerical platform fills a first gap towards the realization of a tool to parametrically assess and optimize intrathecal drug and gene vector delivery protocols and systems. Further investigation is needed to analyze drug spread over a longer clinically relevant time frame.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeHumansSubarachnoid Space

Identifiers

PMID28296953
PMCPMC5351861
OpenAlexW2612401068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.