Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28296923›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Screening gestational diabetes mellitus: The role of maternal age.

Chun-Heng Kuo, Szu-Chi Chen, Chi-Tai Fang, Feng-Jung Nien, En-Tzu Wu, Shin-Yu Lin, Lee-Ming Chuang, Chien-Nan Lee, Hung-Yuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes in Norway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chun-Heng KuoDepartment of Internal Medicine, New Taipei City Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Szu-Chi ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, New Taipei City Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chi-Tai FangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Feng-Jung NienDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-lin branch, Yun-lin, Taiwan.
En-Tzu WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dianthus MFM Clinic, Taiwan.
Shin-Yu LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lee-Ming ChuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Nan LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-Yuan LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-2855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUsing a specific cutoff of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to screen gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can reduce the use of oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). Since the prevalence of GDM increases with age, this screening method may not be appropriate in healthcare systems where women become pregnant at older ages. Therefore, we aimed to develop a screening algorithm for GDM that takes maternal age into consideration.

methodsWe included 945 pregnant women without history of GDM who received 75g OGTT to diagnose GDM in 2011. Screening algorithms using FPG with or without age were developed. Another 362 pregnant women were recruited in 2013-2015 as the validation cohort.

resultsUsing FPG criteria alone, more GDM diagnoses were missed in women ≥35 years than in women <35 years (13.2% vs. 5.8%, p <0.001). Among GDM women ≥35 years, 63.6% had FPG <92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L). Use of the algorithm with an "age plus FPG" cutoff could reduce the use of OGTT (OGTT%) from 77.6% to 62.9%, while maintaining good sensitivity (from 91.9% to 90.2%) and specificity (from 100% to 100%). Similar reduction in OGTT% was found in the validation cohort (from 86.4% to 76.8%). In the simulation, if the percentage of women ≥35 years were 40% or more, the screening algorithm with an "age plus FPG" cutoff could further reduce OGTT% by 11.0%-18.8%.

conclusionsA screening algorithm for GDM that takes maternal age into consideration can reduce the use of OGTT when women become pregnant at older ages.

Indexed as

Maternal AgeBlood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID28296923
PMCPMC5351872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.