Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28296809›Full record

SynthesisTransplantation2017

Incidence of and Risk Assessment for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Monica A Konerman, Danielle Fritze, Richard L Weinberg, Christopher J Sonnenday, Pratima Sharma

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mortality and Causes of Death After Liver Transplantation: Analysis of Sex Differences in a Large Nationwide Cohort.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monica A Konerman1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2 Department of Surgery. 3 Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Danielle Fritze
Richard L Weinberg
Christopher J Sonnenday
Pratima Sharma
Michigan Medicine · US

Funding

Predicting the burden of renal disease among liver transplant recipientsK08DK088946 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHARMA, PRATIMA · 2011 to 2015
$765k
Burden of Hospitalization After Liver TransplantationR03DK102480 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHARMA, PRATIMA · 2015 to 2016
$162k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK088946NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK102480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular events represent a major source of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation and will likely increase given the aging population and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as a leading indication for transplant. The optimal cardiovascular risk stratification approach in this evolving patient population remains unclear. The aims of this systematic review are to: (1) refine the definition, (2) characterize the incidence, and (3) identify risk factors for cardiovascular events post-liver transplantation. Additionally, we evaluated performance characteristics of different cardiac testing modalities.

methodsMEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for studies published between 2002 and 2016 (model of end-stage liver disease era). Two authors independently reviewed articles to select eligible studies and performed data abstraction.

resultsTwenty-nine studies representing 57 493 patients from 26 unique cohorts were included. Definitions of cardiovascular outcomes were highly inconsistent. Incidence rates were widely variable: 1% to 41% for outcomes of 6 months or shorter and 0% to 31% for outcomes longer than 6 months. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that older age and history of cardiac disease were the most consistent predictors of cardiovascular events posttransplant (significant in 8/23 and 7/22, studies, respectively). Predictive capacity of various cardiac imaging modalities was also discrepant.

conclusionsThe true incidence of cardiovascular outcomes post-liver transplant remains unknown in large part due to lack of consensus regarding outcome definition. Overall, poor data quality and gaps in knowledge limit the ability to clearly identify predictors of outcomes, but existing data support a more aggressive risk stratification protocol for patients of advanced age and/or with preexisting cardiac disease.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansIncidenceLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28296809
PMCPMC5481461
OpenAlexW2596902052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.