Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28296757›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

Radiological prediction of tumor invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma on thin-section CT.

Masahiro Yanagawa, Takeshi Johkoh, Masayuki Noguchi, Eiichi Morii, Yasushi Shintani, Meinoshin Okumura, Akinori Hata, Maki Fujiwara, Osamu Honda, Noriyuki Tomiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Indolent Lung Cancer.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2026
    Guideline
  2. [Advance in Diagnose and Treatment Strategies of Adenocarcinoma in Situ].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. New T1 classification.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. [Computed tomography findings, clinicopathological features, genetic characteristics and prognosis ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masahiro YanagawaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka Department of Radiology, Kinki Central Hospital of Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Itami, Hyogo Department of Diagnostic Pathology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Department of Pathology Department of Respiratory Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi Johkoh
Masayuki Noguchi
Eiichi Morii
Yasushi Shintani
Meinoshin Okumura
Akinori Hata
Maki Fujiwara
Osamu Honda
Noriyuki Tomiyama

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate thin-section computed tomography (CT) (TSCT) features that differentiate adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IVA), and to determine the size of solid portion on CT that correlates to pathological invasive components. Forty-eight patients were included. Nodules were classified into ground-glass nodule (GGN), part-solid, solid, and heterogeneous. Visual density of GGNs was subjectively evaluated using reference standard images: faint GGN (Ga), <-700 Hounsfield unit (HU); intermediate GGN (Gb), from -700 to -400 HU; dense GGN (Gc), >-400 HU; and mixed (Ga + Gb, Ga + Gc, and Gb + Gc). The evaluated TSCT findings included margin of nodule, distribution of solid portion, distribution of air bronchiologram, and pleural indentation. The longest diameters of the solid portion and the entire tumor were measured. Invasive diameters were measured in pathological specimens. Twenty-two AISs (16 GGNs [7 Ga, 5 Gb, 2 Gc, 1 Ga + Gc, 1 Gb + Gc], 4 part-solids, and 2 heterogeneous), 6 MIAs (1 GGN [Gb + Gc], 3 part-solids, and 2 solids), and 20 IVAs (1 GGN [Gb], 3 part-solids, and 16 solid) were found. The longest diameter (mean ± standard deviation) of the solid portion and total tumor were 9.7 ± 9.7 and 18.9 ± 5.6 mm, respectively. Significant differences in TSCT findings between AIS and IVA were margin of nodule (Pearson chi-squared test, P = 0.004), distribution of air bronchiologram (P = 0.0148), and pleural indentation (P = 0.0067). A solid portion >5.3 mm on TSCT indicated MIA or IVA, and >7.3 mm indicated IVA (receiver operating characteristic analysis, P < 0.0001). Irregular margin, air bronchiologram with disruption and/or irregular dilatation, and pleural indentation may distinguish IVA from AIS. A 5.3 to 7.3 mm solid portion on TSCT indicates MIA/IVA, and a solid portion >7.3 mm on TSCT indicates IVA.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28296757
PMCPMC5369912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.