Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28296677›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2017

RBM10-TFE3 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall Due to Cryptic Intrachromosomal Xp11.2 Inversion Resulting in False-negative TFE3 FISH.

Pedram Argani, Lei Zhang, Victor E Reuter, Satish K Tickoo, Cristina R Antonescu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Cancers · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecularly defined renal cell carcinomas.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genomic alterations and diagnosis of renal cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. International journal of surgical pathology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedram ArganiDepartments of *Pathology †Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD ‡Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Lei Zhang
Victor E Reuter
Satish K Tickoo
Cristina R Antonescu
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA PROGRAM PROJECTP01CA047179 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI ANTONESCU, CRISTINA R · 1989 to 2010
$17.3M
SPORE in Soft Tissue SarcomaP50CA140146 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LADANYI, MARC · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA047179NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are defined by chromosome translocations involving the Xp11 breakpoint which results in one of a variety of TFE3 gene fusions. TFE3 break-apart florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays are generally preferred to TFE3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a means of confirming the diagnosis in archival material, as FISH is less sensitive to the variable fixation which can result in false positive or false negative IHC. Prompted by a case report in the cytogenetics literature, we identify 3 cases of Xp11 translocation RCC characterized by a subtle chromosomal inversion involving the short arm of the X chromosome, resulting in an RBM10-TFE3 gene fusion. TFE3 rearrangement was not detected by conventional TFE3 break-apart FISH, but was suggested by strong diffuse TFE3 immunoreactivity in a clean background. We then developed novel fosmid probes to detect the RBM10-TFE3 gene fusion in archival material. These cases validate RBM10-TFE3 as a recurrent gene fusion in Xp11 translocation RCC, illustrate a source of false-negative TFE3 break-apart FISH, and highlight the complementary role of TFE3 IHC and TFE3 FISH.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionChromosomes, Human, XGene FusionIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceBaltimoreBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCathepsin KFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunohistochemistryKidney NeoplasmsMaleBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorCathepsin KCTSK protein, humanRBM10 protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsTFE3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28296677
PMCPMC5391276
OpenAlexW2596776838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.