Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28296391›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2017

Reparametrization of Protein Force Field Nonbonded Interactions Guided by Osmotic Coefficient Measurements from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Mark S Miller, Wesley K Lay, Shuxiang Li, William C Hacker, Jiadi An, Jianlan Ren, Adrian H Elcock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark S MillerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Wesley K LayDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Shuxiang LiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
William C HackerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Jiadi AnDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Jianlan RenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Adrian H ElcockDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-1376

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN BIOTECHNOLOGYT32GM008365 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KERNS, ROBERT JOHN · 1990 to 2021
$3.8M
Molecular Simulations of Folding & Association in Physiological EnvironmentsR01GM087290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ELCOCK, ADRIAN HAMILTON · 2009 to 2017
$1.6M
Molecular Simulations of Cotranslational FoldingR01GM099865 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ELCOCK, ADRIAN HAMILTON · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087290NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099865NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a small, but growing, body of literature describing the use of osmotic coefficient measurements to validate and reparametrize simulation force fields. Here we have investigated the ability of five very commonly used force field and water model combinations to reproduce the osmotic coefficients of seven neutral amino acids and five small molecules. The force fields tested include AMBER ff99SB-ILDN, CHARMM36, GROMOS54a7, and OPLS-AA, with the first of these tested in conjunction with the TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew water models. In general, for both the amino acids and the small molecules, the tested force fields produce computed osmotic coefficients that are lower than experiment; this is indicative of excessively favorable solute-solute interactions. The sole exception to this general trend is provided by GROMOS54a7 when applied to amino acids: in this case, the computed osmotic coefficients are consistently too high. Importantly, we show that all of the force fields tested can be made to accurately reproduce the experimental osmotic coefficients of the amino acids when minor modifications-some previously reported by others and some that are new to this study-are made to the van der Waals interactions of the charged terminal groups. Special care is required, however, when simulating Proline with a number of the force fields, and a hydroxyl-group specific modification is required in order to correct Serine and Threonine when simulated with AMBER ff99SB-ILDN. Interestingly, an alternative parametrization of the van der Waals interactions in the latter force field, proposed by the Nerenberg and Head-Gordon groups, is shown to immediately produce osmotic coefficients that are in excellent agreement with experiment. Overall, this study reinforces the idea that osmotic coefficient measurements can be used to identify general shortcomings in commonly used force fields' descriptions of solute-solute interactions and further demonstrates that modifications to van der Waals parameters provide a simple route to optimizing agreement with experiment.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAmino AcidsOsmotic PressureSmall Molecule LibrariesAmino AcidsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID28296391
PMCPMC5543770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.