Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28296247›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2017

Comprehensive proteome analysis of human skeletal muscle in cachexia and sarcopenia: a pilot study.

H Alexander Ebhardt, Simone Degen, Valentina Tadini, Alain Schilb, Neil Johns, Carolyn A Greig, Kenneth C H Fearon, Ruedi Aebersold, Carsten Jacobi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A health-system-scale, episode-resolved multimodal atlas of cancer cachexia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Skeletal muscle omics signatures in cancer cachexia: perspectives and opportunities.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

H Alexander EbhardtInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, Department of Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-8388
Simone DegenNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Valentina TadiniNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Alain SchilbNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Neil JohnsClinical Sciences (Surgery), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Carolyn A GreigSchool of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences and MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kenneth C H FearonClinical Sciences (Surgery), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Ruedi AebersoldInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, Department of Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Carsten JacobiNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Basel, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Edinburgh · GBArthritis UK · GBUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia (cancer-induced muscle wasting) is found in a subgroup of cancer patients leaving the patients with a poor prognosis for survival due to a lower tolerance of the chemotherapeutic drug. The cause of the muscle wasting in these patients is not fully understood, and no predictive biomarker exists to identify these patients early on. Skeletal muscle loss is an inevitable consequence of advancing age. As cancer frequently occurs in old age, identifying and differentiating the molecular mechanisms mediating muscle wasting in cancer cachexia vs. age-related sarcopenia are a challenge. However, the ability to distinguish between them is critical for early intervention, and simple measures of body weight may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect cachexia early.

methodsWe used a range of omics approaches: (i) undepleted proteome was quantified using advanced high mass accuracy mass spectrometers in SWATH-MS acquisition mode; (ii) phospho epitopes were quantified using protein arrays; and (iii) morphology was assessed using fluorescent microscopy.

resultsWe quantified the soluble proteome of muscle biopsies from cancer cachexia patients and compared them with cohorts of cancer patients and healthy individuals with and without age-related muscle loss (aka age-related sarcopenia). Comparing the proteomes of these cohorts, we quantified changes in muscle contractile myosins and energy metabolism allowing for a clear identification of cachexia patients. In an in vitro time lapse experiment, we mimicked cancer cachexia and identified signal transduction pathways governing cell fusion to play a pivotal role in preventing muscle regeneration.

conclusionsThe work presented here lays the foundation for further understanding of muscle wasting diseases and holds the promise of overcoming ambiguous weight loss as a measure for defining cachexia to be replaced by a precise protein signature.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgingCachexiaCells, CulturedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyPilot ProjectsProteomeSarcopeniaMuscle ProteinsProteomeCancer cachexiaProteome quantificationSignal transductionSWATH-MSTNFα

Identifiers

PMID28296247
PMCPMC5566647
OpenAlexW2652836589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.