Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295803›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Functional brain segmentation using inter-subject correlation in fMRI.

Jukka-Pekka Kauppi, Juha Pajula, Jari Niemi, Riitta Hari, Jussi Tohka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain and behavioral alterations in subjects with social anxiety dominated by empathic embarrassment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jukka-Pekka KauppiDepartment of Mathematical Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-5583
Juha PajulaDepartment of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Jari NiemiDepartment of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Riitta HariDepartment of Art, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.
Jussi TohkaAI Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain continuously processes massive amounts of rich sensory information. To better understand such highly complex brain processes, modern neuroimaging studies are increasingly utilizing experimental setups that better mimic daily-life situations. A new exploratory data-analysis approach, functional segmentation inter-subject correlation analysis (FuSeISC), was proposed to facilitate the analysis of functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) data sets collected in these experiments. The method provides a new type of functional segmentation of brain areas, not only characterizing areas that display similar processing across subjects but also areas in which processing across subjects is highly variable. FuSeISC was tested using fMRI data sets collected during traditional block-design stimuli (37 subjects) as well as naturalistic auditory narratives (19 subjects). The method identified spatially local and/or bilaterally symmetric clusters in several cortical areas, many of which are known to be processing the types of stimuli used in the experiments. The method is not only useful for spatial exploration of large fMRI data sets obtained using naturalistic stimuli, but also has other potential applications, such as generation of a functional brain atlases including both lower- and higher-order processing areas. Finally, as a part of FuSeISC, a criterion-based sparsification of the shared nearest-neighbor graph was proposed for detecting clusters in noisy data. In the tests with synthetic data, this technique was superior to well-known clustering methods, such as Ward's method, affinity propagation, and K-means ++. Hum Brain Mapp 38:2643-2665, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAlgorithmsBrainCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalOxygenTime FactorsYoung AdultOxygenfunctional magnetic resonance imagingfunctional segmentationGaussian mixture modelhuman braininter-subject correlationinter-subject variabilitynaturalistic stimulationshared nearest-neighbor graph

Identifiers

PMID28295803
PMCPMC6867053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.