Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295794›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol review2017

Alcohol and disadvantaged men: A feasibility trial of an intervention delivered by mobile phone.

Iain K Crombie, Linda Irvine, Donald W Falconer, Brian Williams, Ian W Ricketts, Claire Jones, Gerry Humphris, John Norrie, Peter Slane, Peter Rice

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Technology-Based Substance Use Interventions: Opportunities for Gender-Transformative Health Promotion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iain K CrombieDivision of Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Linda IrvineDivision of Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Donald W FalconerDivision of Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Brian WilliamsSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ian W RickettsSchool of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Claire JonesHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Gerry HumphrisBute Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
John NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit (ECTU), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Peter SlaneArthurstone Medical Centre, NHS Tayside, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Peter RiceDivision of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 09/3001/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsDisadvantaged men suffer substantial harm from heavy drinking. This feasibility study developed and evaluated the methods for a trial of a brief intervention delivered by text messages to disadvantaged men. It aimed to test the methods for recruitment and retention, to monitor engagement with the intervention and assess the overall acceptability of study methods. DESIGN AND

methodsDisadvantaged men aged 25-44 years who had ≥2 episodes of binge drinking (≥8 units in one session) in the preceding month were recruited. Two recruitment strategies were assessed: recruitment from general practice registers and by a community outreach strategy. Theoretically and empirically based text messages were tailored to the target group.

resultsThe study recruited 67 disadvantaged men at high risk of alcohol-related harm, exceeding the target of 60. Evaluation showed that 95% of text messages were delivered, and the men engaged enthusiastically with the intervention. Retention at follow up was 96%. Outcomes were successfully measured on all men followed up. This provided data for the sample size calculation for the full trial. Post-study evaluation showed high levels of satisfaction with the study. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThis study has shown that disadvantaged men can be recruited and follow-up data obtained in an alcohol intervention study. The study methods were acceptable to the participants. The men recruited were at high risk of alcohol-related harms. It also clarified ways in which the recruitment strategy, the baseline questionnaire and the intervention could be improved. The full trial is currently underway. [Crombie IK, Irvine L, Falconer DW, Williams B, Ricketts IW, Jones C, Humphris G, Norrie J, Slane P, Rice P. Alcohol and disadvantaged men: A feasibility trial of an intervention delivered by mobile phone. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;36:468-476].

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingBinge DrinkingCell PhoneFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesText MessagingVulnerable Populationsbinge drinkingfeasibility studymantext messagingvulnerable population

Identifiers

PMID28295794
PMCPMC5516166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.