Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295414›Full record

Trial reportAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2017

Temporal Stability of Heavy Drinking Days and Drinking Reductions Among Heavy Drinkers in the COMBINE Study.

Katie Witkiewitz, Adam D Wilson, Matthew R Pearson, Kevin A Hallgren, Daniel E Falk, Raye Z Litten, Henry R Kranzler, Karl F Mann, Deborah S Hasin, Stephanie S O'Malley and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katie WitkiewitzDepartment of Psychology and Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-3067
Adam D WilsonDepartment of Psychology and Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Matthew R PearsonDepartment of Psychology and Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Kevin A HallgrenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Daniel E FalkNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, Maryland.
Raye Z LittenNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, Maryland.
Henry R KranzlerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Karl F MannCentral Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.
Deborah S HasinDepartments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Stephanie S O'MalleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Raymond F AntonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-6576

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
TREATING ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL WITH LORAZEPAM/NALTREXONEP50AA010761 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Patrick J. Mulholland · 1996 to 2026
$46.8M
Psychology Training in Alcohol Research (PTAR)T32AA007455 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARY E. LARIMER · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
Alcohol Research Training: Methods & MechanismsT32AA018108 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2010 to 2026
$5.6M
Precision Medicine and Recovery in a Telehealth Treatment Program for Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA022328 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2013 to 2026
$3.1M
Drinking levels (binge, volume) and alcohol consequences: using national data to identify clinical trial endpoints - Administrative SupplementR01AA025309 · NIAAA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HASIN, DEBORAH S · 2016 to 2021
$925k
Efficacy and neurobiological mechanisms of mobile-delivered cognitive retrainingK01AA023233 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI PEARSON, MATTHEW RYAN · 2014 to 2018
$832k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA023233NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010761NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022328NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025309NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007455NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA018108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed to expand the options for primary end points in the development of medications for alcohol use disorder to include either abstinence from alcohol or a nonabstinent outcome: no heavy drinking days (with a heavy drinking day defined as more than 3 drinks per day for women and more than 4 drinks per day for men [>3/>4 cutoff]). The FDA also suggested that 6 months would be the most appropriate length for a clinical trial to demonstrate the stability of this nonabstinent drinking outcome. However, few alcohol clinical trials have examined the stability of nonheavy drinking during and after treatment.

methodsIn a secondary analysis of the COMBINE study data (n = 1,383), we examined transitions in heavy drinking days during the course of treatment (months 1 through 4), during the transition out of treatment (months 4 through 7), and up to 12 months afterward (months 13 through 16) using latent variable mixture models.

resultsHeavy drinking and nonheavy drinking were relatively stable in consecutive months (minimum agreement [kappa] = 0.64 for months 1 to 2). Most individuals were stable low-risk drinkers/abstainers or heavy drinkers by the end of treatment, as characterized by a 10% probability (or less) of transitioning out of either a no heavy drinking state or a heavy drinking state. More than two-thirds of the heavy drinkers who exceeded the heavy drinking threshold during treatment reported, on average, a 64% reduction in drinking frequency and a 38% reduction in drinking intensity from pretreatment drinking levels.

conclusionsThe results show stability of no heavy drinking as an outcome within the first 4 months of treatment and that the >3/>4 drink cutoff may mask substantial reductions in alcohol consumption among some patients. Future studies should explore the clinical utility of reduction end points.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleTime FactorsAlcohol Clinical TrialsAlcohol TreatmentAlcohol Use DisorderHeavy Drinking DaysPrimary End Points for Alcohol Medications

Identifiers

PMID28295414
PMCPMC5404970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.