ArticleMedical physics2017
An integrated segmentation and shape-based classification scheme for distinguishing adenocarcinomas from granulomas on lung CT.
Article in Medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Pooled it
- Spectral CT-based radiomics signature for distinguishing malignant pulmonary nodules from benign.BMC cancer · 2023Trial
- Non-enhanced CT deep learning model for differentiating lung adenocarcinoma from tuberculoma: a multicenter diagnostic study.European radiology · 2025Article
- Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinomas: Development and Evaluation of Radiomic-Based Methods to Measure Baseline Intra-Patient Inter-Tumor Lesion Heterogeneity.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Radiomic features of PET/CT imaging of large B cell lymphoma lesions predicts CAR T cell therapy efficacy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Review
- What does radiomics do in PD-L1 blockade therapy of NSCLC patients?Thoracic cancer · 2022Review
- Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction in Sequential CT Scans: Summary of ISBI 2018 Challenge.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Application of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Lung Cancer Precision Medicine.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas by integrating stable and discriminating radiomic features on non-contrast computed tomography scans.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2021Article
- Distinguishing Adenocarcinomas from Granulomas in the CT scan of the chest: performance degradation evaluation in the automatic segmentation framework.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- A shape-adjusted ellipse approach corrects for varied axonal dispersion angles and myelination in primate nerve roots.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Improving segmentation accuracy of CT kidney cancer images using adaptive active contour model.Medicine · 2020Article
- Thyroid Nodule Classification for Physician Decision Support Using Machine Learning-Evaluated Geometric and Morphological Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Sensitivity analysis of FDG PET tumor voxel cluster radiomics and dosimetry for predicting mid-chemoradiation regional response of locally advanced lung cancer.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Prediction of tumor doubling time of lung adenocarcinoma using radiomic margin characteristics.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Using CT texture analysis to differentiate between peripheral lung cancer and pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumor.BMC medical imaging · 2020Article
- Radiomics in Lung Cancer from Basic to Advanced: Current Status and Future Directions.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDistinguishing between benign granulmoas and adenocarcinomas is confounded by their similar visual appearance on routine CT scans. Unfortunately, owing to the inability to discriminate these lesions radigraphically, many patients with benign granulomas are subjected to unnecessary surgical wedge resections and biopsies for pathologic confirmation of cancer presence or absence. This suggests the need for improved computerized characterization of these nodules in order to distinguish between these two classes of lesions on CT scans. While there has been substantial interest in the use of textural analysis for radiomic characterization of lung nodules, relatively less work has been done in shape based characterization of lung nodules, particularly with respect to granulmoas and adenocarcinomas. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the role of 3D shape features for discrimination of benign granulomas from malignant adenocarcinomas on lung CT images. Towards this end we present an integrated framework for segmentation, feature characterization and classification of these nodules on CT.
methodsThe nodule segmentation method starts with separation of lung regions from the surrounding lung anatomy. Next, the lung CT scans are projected into and represented in a three dimensional spectral embedding (SE) space, allowing for better determination of the boundaries of the nodule. This then enables the application of a gradient vector flow active contour (SEGvAC) model for nodule boundary extraction. A set of 24 shape features from both 2D slices and 3D surface of the segmented nodules are extracted, including features pertaining to the angularity, spiculation, elongation and nodule compactness. A feature selection scheme, PCA-VIP, is employed to identify the most discriminating set of features to distinguish granulmoas from adenocarcinomas within a learning set of 82 patients. The features thus identified were then combined with a support vector machine classifier and independently validated on a distinct test set comprising 67 patients. The performance of the classifier for both of the training and validation cohorts was evaluated by the area under receiver characteristic curve (ROC).
resultsWe used 82 and 67 studies from two different institutions respectively for training and independent validation of the model and the shape features. The Dice coefficient between automatically segmented nodules by SEGvAC and the manual delineations by expert radiologists (readers) was 0.84± 0.04 whereas inter-reader segmentation agreement was 0.79± 0.12. We also identified a set of consistent features (Roughness, Convexity and Spherecity) that were found to be strongly correlated across both manual and automated nodule segmentations (R > 0.80, p < 0.0001) and capture the marginal smoothness and 3D compactness of the nodules. On the independent validation set of 67 studies our classifier yielded a ROC AUC of 0.72 and 0.64 for manually- and automatically segmented nodules respectively. On a subset of 20 studies, the AUCs for the two expert radiologists and 1 pulmonologist were found to be 0.82, 0.68 and 0.58 respectively.
conclusionsThe major finding of this study was that certain shape features appear to differentially express between granulomas and adenocarcinomas and thus computer extracted shape cues could be used to distinguish these radiographically similar pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.