Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295386›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2017

An integrated segmentation and shape-based classification scheme for distinguishing adenocarcinomas from granulomas on lung CT.

Mehdi Alilou, Niha Beig, Mahdi Orooji, Prabhakar Rajiah, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Sagar Rakshit, Niyoti Reddy, Michael Yang, Frank Jacono, Robert C Gilkeson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mehdi AlilouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Niha BeigDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Mahdi OroojiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Prabhakar RajiahDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Vamsidhar VelchetiTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Sagar RakshitTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Niyoti ReddyTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Michael YangDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Frank JaconoDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Robert C GilkesonDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Philip LindenDivision of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Anant MadabhushiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Funding

Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Comprehensive quantitative ultrafast 3D liver MRIR01DK098503 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GULANI, VIKAS, SEIBERLICH, NICOLE · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Histologic image-based aggressiveness prediction in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinomaR21CA179327 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2014 to 2015
$389k
Computerized morphologic-molecular predictor of progression in DCISR21CA195152 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BADVE, SUNIL S., MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2016
$388k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R21 CA179327NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195152NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDistinguishing between benign granulmoas and adenocarcinomas is confounded by their similar visual appearance on routine CT scans. Unfortunately, owing to the inability to discriminate these lesions radigraphically, many patients with benign granulomas are subjected to unnecessary surgical wedge resections and biopsies for pathologic confirmation of cancer presence or absence. This suggests the need for improved computerized characterization of these nodules in order to distinguish between these two classes of lesions on CT scans. While there has been substantial interest in the use of textural analysis for radiomic characterization of lung nodules, relatively less work has been done in shape based characterization of lung nodules, particularly with respect to granulmoas and adenocarcinomas. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the role of 3D shape features for discrimination of benign granulomas from malignant adenocarcinomas on lung CT images. Towards this end we present an integrated framework for segmentation, feature characterization and classification of these nodules on CT.

methodsThe nodule segmentation method starts with separation of lung regions from the surrounding lung anatomy. Next, the lung CT scans are projected into and represented in a three dimensional spectral embedding (SE) space, allowing for better determination of the boundaries of the nodule. This then enables the application of a gradient vector flow active contour (SEGvAC) model for nodule boundary extraction. A set of 24 shape features from both 2D slices and 3D surface of the segmented nodules are extracted, including features pertaining to the angularity, spiculation, elongation and nodule compactness. A feature selection scheme, PCA-VIP, is employed to identify the most discriminating set of features to distinguish granulmoas from adenocarcinomas within a learning set of 82 patients. The features thus identified were then combined with a support vector machine classifier and independently validated on a distinct test set comprising 67 patients. The performance of the classifier for both of the training and validation cohorts was evaluated by the area under receiver characteristic curve (ROC).

resultsWe used 82 and 67 studies from two different institutions respectively for training and independent validation of the model and the shape features. The Dice coefficient between automatically segmented nodules by SEGvAC and the manual delineations by expert radiologists (readers) was 0.84± 0.04 whereas inter-reader segmentation agreement was 0.79± 0.12. We also identified a set of consistent features (Roughness, Convexity and Spherecity) that were found to be strongly correlated across both manual and automated nodule segmentations (R > 0.80, p < 0.0001) and capture the marginal smoothness and 3D compactness of the nodules. On the independent validation set of 67 studies our classifier yielded a ROC AUC of 0.72 and 0.64 for manually- and automatically segmented nodules respectively. On a subset of 20 studies, the AUCs for the two expert radiologists and 1 pulmonologist were found to be 0.82, 0.68 and 0.58 respectively.

conclusionsThe major finding of this study was that certain shape features appear to differentially express between granulomas and adenocarcinomas and thus computer extracted shape cues could be used to distinguish these radiographically similar pathologies.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungGranulomaHumansLung NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleCADxLung CTnodule characterizationsegmentationshape analysis

Identifiers

PMID28295386
PMCPMC5988352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.