Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295236›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2017

Pharmacology and Therapeutics Education in the European Union Needs Harmonization and Modernization: A Cross-sectional Survey Among 185 Medical Schools in 27 Countries.

D J Brinkman, J Tichelaar, M Okorie, L Bissell, T Christiaens, R Likic, R Mačìulaitis, J Costa, E J Sanz, B I Tamba and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

D J BrinkmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J TichelaarDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M OkorieMedical Education Unit, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
L BissellMedical Education Unit, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
T ChristiaensDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
R LikicUnit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
R MačìulaitisFaculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
J CostaDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
E J SanzFaculty of Medicine, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
B I TambaDepartment of Pharmacology and Algesiology, Gr. T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
S R MaxwellUnit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
M C RichirDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M A van AgtmaelDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Education Working Group of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT)
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBGhent University Hospital · BEGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTUniversidad de La Laguna · ESUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective teaching in pharmacology and clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) is necessary to make medical students competent prescribers. However, the current structure, delivery, and assessment of CPT education in the European Union (EU) is unknown. We sent an online questionnaire to teachers with overall responsibility for CPT education in EU medical schools. Questions focused on undergraduate teaching and assessment of CPT, and students' preparedness for prescribing. In all, 185 medical schools (64%) from 27 EU countries responded. Traditional learning methods were mainly used. The majority of respondents did not provide students with the opportunity to practice real-life prescribing and believed that their students were not well prepared for prescribing. There is a marked difference in the quality and quantity of CPT education within and between EU countries, suggesting that there is considerable scope for improvement. A collaborative approach should be adopted to harmonize and modernize the undergraduate CPT education across the EU.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEuropean UnionStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansPharmacology, ClinicalSchools, Medical

Identifiers

PMID28295236
PMCPMC5655694
OpenAlexW2617255185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.