Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295182›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2017

A phase 1 trial of temsirolimus and intensive re-induction chemotherapy for 2nd or greater relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a Children's Oncology Group study (ADVL1114).

Susan R Rheingold, Sarah K Tasian, James A Whitlock, David T Teachey, Michael J Borowitz, Xiaowei Liu, Charles G Minard, Elizabeth Fox, Brenda J Weigel, Susan M Blaney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan R RheingoldDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sarah K TasianDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James A WhitlockDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David T TeacheyDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael J BorowitzDepartment of Pathology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Xiaowei LiuChildren's Oncology Group Operations Center, Monrovia, CA, USA.
Charles G MinardDan L. Duncan Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth FoxDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brenda J WeigelUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Susan M BlaneyDan L. Duncan Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USBaylor College of Medicine · USChildren's Cancer Center · USChildren's Oncology Group · USHospital for Sick Children · CASidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Pediatric Pilot/Phase I Consortium - Foreign AccrualU01CA097452 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI BLANEY, SUSAN M. · 2002 to 2011
$28.2M
Pediatric Phase 1/Pilot ConsortiumUM1CA097452 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI WEIGEL, BRENDA J. · 2009 to 2018
$17.7M
Physician Scientist Training in Clinical OncologyK12CA076931 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STEPHEN Patrick HUNGER, LYNN M. SCHUCHTER · 1997 to 2026
$16.5M
PI3K Pathway Inhibition for Philadelphia-Like Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaK08CA184418 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI TASIAN, SARAH KATHLEEN · 2014 to 2018
$848k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA184418NCI NIH HHS K12 CA076931NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097452NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA097452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway is commonly dysregulated in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). A phase 1 trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in combination with UKALL R3 re-induction chemotherapy was conducted in children and adolescents with second or greater relapse of ALL. The initial temsirolimus dose level (DL1) was 10 mg/m

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyInfantMalePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasePhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaProtein Kinase InhibitorsRecurrencePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasePhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSirolimustemsirolimusacute lymphoblastic leukaemiaclinical trialsmTOR inhibitorpharmacodynamicsrelapse

Identifiers

PMID28295182
PMCPMC5403576
OpenAlexW2603924317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.