Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295177›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2017

A fast small-sample kernel independence test for microbiome community-level association analysis.

Xiang Zhan, Anna Plantinga, Ni Zhao, Michael C Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multivariate differential association analysis.Stat (International Statistical Institute) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Kernel-based Test of Independence for Cluster-correlated Data.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiang ZhanPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, U.S.A.
Anna PlantingaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, U.S.A.
Ni ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, U.S.A.
Michael C WuPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, U.S.A.

Funding

SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MEGAN OTHUS · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Enhanced Gene Identification in Complex Traits Using Kernel MachinesR01HG007508 · NHGRI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI EPSTEIN, MICHAEL PHILIP · 2013 to 2015
$1.0M
FHCRC High-Performance Computing ClusterS10OD020069 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007508NIH HHS S10 OD020069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To fully understand the role of microbiome in human health and diseases, researchers are increasingly interested in assessing the relationship between microbiome composition and host genomic data. The dimensionality of the data as well as complex relationships between microbiota and host genomics pose considerable challenges for analysis. In this article, we apply a kernel RV coefficient (KRV) test to evaluate the overall association between host gene expression and microbiome composition. The KRV statistic can capture nonlinear correlations and complex relationships among the individual data types and between gene expression and microbiome composition through measuring general dependency. Testing proceeds via a similar route as existing tests of the generalized RV coefficients and allows for rapid p-value calculation. Strategies to allow adjustment for confounding effects, which is crucial for avoiding misleading results, and to alleviate the problem of selecting the most favorable kernel are considered. Simulation studies show that KRV is useful in testing statistical independence with finite samples given the kernels are appropriately chosen, and can powerfully identify existing associations between microbiome composition and host genomic data while protecting type I error. We apply the KRV to a microbiome study examining the relationship between host transcriptome and microbiome composition within the context of inflammatory bowel disease and are able to derive new biological insights and provide formal inference on prior qualitative observations.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMicrobiotaSpatial AnalysisTranscriptomeKernelMicrobiome compositionMultivariate association testOmnibus testRV coefficient

Identifiers

PMID28295177
PMCPMC5592124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.