Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295029›Full record

ArticleHeredity2017

Is homoploid hybrid speciation that rare? An empiricist's view.

G Nieto Feliner, I Álvarez, J Fuertes-Aguilar, M Heuertz, I Marques, F Moharrek, R Piñeiro, R Riina, J A Rosselló, P S Soltis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The hybrid history of zebrafish.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomics of plant speciation.Plant communications · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

G Nieto FelinerReal Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
I ÁlvarezReal Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
J Fuertes-AguilarReal Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
M HeuertzBioGeCo INRA, Université de Bordeaux, Cestas, France.
I MarquesDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, High Polytechnic School of Huesca, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9788-4831
F MoharrekDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
R PiñeiroJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
R RiinaReal Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7423-899X
J A RossellóJardí Botànic, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
P S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
I Villa-MachíoReal Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationHybridization, GeneticAnimalsPhylogenyPlantsPloidiesReproductive Isolation

Identifiers

PMID28295029
PMCPMC5436029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.