Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28295025›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Glycol porphyrin derivatives and temoporfin elicit resistance to photodynamic therapy by different mechanisms.

Jarmila Kralova, Michal Kolar, Michal Kahle, Jaroslav Truksa, Sandra Lettlova, Kamila Balusikova, Petr Bartunek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jarmila KralovaCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal KolarCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal KahleCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav TruksaCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Sandra LettlovaCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Kamila BalusikovaCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr BartunekCZ-OPENSCREEN: National Infrastructure for Chemical Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the ASCR, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of drug resistance is a major problem which often occurs during anticancer chemotherapies. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been studied as an alternative treatment modality for drug-resistant tumors, however the question of resistance to PDT and potential cross-resistance with chemotherapy has yet to be fully answered. To investigate the mechanism of resistance to PDT, we developed an in vitro experimental model system in a mouse mammary carcinoma cell line 4T1. We used two ethylene glycol derivatives of tetraphenylporphyrin, and tetraphenylchlorin derivative, temoporfin, as photosensitizers (PS). PDT-resistant clones were obtained by exposure to a set concentration of PS followed by irradiation with increasing light doses. PDT resistance to soluble glycol porphyrins was mediated mainly by increased drug efflux through ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) as we demonstrated by specific ABCB1 knockdown experiments, which in turn rescued the sensitivity of resistant cells to PDT. In contrast, resistance raised to temoporfin, which is generally more lipophilic than glycol porphyrins, elicited mechanism based on sequestration of the drug to lysosomes. The resistance that is acquired from a particular PS could be overcome by using a different PS, which is not susceptible to the same mechanism(s) of resistance. Elucidation of the underlying mechanisms in various types of resistance might facilitate improvements in PDT treatment design.

Indexed as

AnimalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Drug Resistance, NeoplasmEthylene GlycolsFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesGlycolsHumansMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMCF-7 CellsMesoporphyrinsMicePaclitaxelPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Ethylene GlycolsGlycolsMesoporphyrinsPaclitaxelPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinstemoporfin

Identifiers

PMID28295025
PMCPMC5353759
OpenAlexW2679102071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.