Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28294936›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2017

Examining the feasibility of implementing behavioural economics strategies that encourage home dinner vegetable intake among low-income children.

Tashara M Leak, Alison Swenson, Aaron Rendahl, Zata Vickers, Elton Mykerezi, Joseph P Redden, Traci Mann, Marla Reicks

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tashara M Leak1School of Public Health,University of California,50 University Hall,#7360,Berkeley,CA 94720,USA.
Alison Swenson2Department of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Minnesota,Saint Paul,MN,USA.
Aaron Rendahl3School of Statistics,University of Minnesota,Saint Paul,MN,USA.
Zata Vickers2Department of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Minnesota,Saint Paul,MN,USA.
Elton Mykerezi4Department of Applied Economics,University of Minnesota,Saint Paul,MN,USA.
Joseph P Redden5Carlson School of Management,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
Traci Mann6Department of Psychology,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
Marla Reicks2Department of Food Science and Nutrition,University of Minnesota,Saint Paul,MN,USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6726-9408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the feasibility of implementing nine behavioural economics-informed strategies, or 'nudges', that aimed to encourage home dinner vegetable intake among low-income children.

designCaregivers were assigned six of nine strategies and implemented one new strategy per week (i.e. 6 weeks) during three dinner meals. Caregivers recorded child dinner vegetable intake on the nights of strategy implementation and rated the level of difficulty for assigned strategies. Baseline data on home vegetable availability and child vegetable liking were collected to assess overall strategy feasibility.

settingParticipants' homes in a large Midwestern metropolitan area, USA. SUBJECTS: Low-income caregiver/child (aged 9-12 years) dyads (n 39).

resultsPairwise comparisons showed that child dinner vegetable intake for the strategy 'Serve at least two vegetables with dinner meals' was greater than intake for each of two other strategies: 'Pair vegetables with other foods the child likes' and 'Eat dinner together with an adult(s) modelling vegetable consumption'. Overall, caregivers' mean rating of difficulty for implementing strategies was 2·6 (1='not difficult', 10='very difficult'). Households had a mean of ten different types of vegetables available. Children reported a rating ≥5 for seventeen types of vegetable on a labelled hedonic scale (1='hate it', 5-6='it's okay', 10='like it a lot').

conclusionsBehavioural economics-informed strategies are feasible to implement during dinner meals, with some strategies differing by how much they influence vegetable intake among low-income children in the home.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFood PreferencesHealth BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsChildDietFamily CharacteristicsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMealsVegetablesBehavioural economicsChildrenHome settingLow-incomeVegetables

Identifiers

PMID28294936
PMCPMC10261397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.