Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28294716›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2017

Cortical Networks Involved in Memory for Temporal Order.

Anna Manelis, Vencislav Popov, Christopher Paynter, Matthew Walsh, Mark E Wheeler, Keith M Vogt, Lynne M Reder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  2. Altered Time Awareness in Dementia.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Manelis1 University of Pittsburgh.
Vencislav Popov2 Carnegie Mellon University.
Christopher Paynter2 Carnegie Mellon University.
Matthew Walsh2 Carnegie Mellon University.
Mark E Wheeler4 Georgia Institute of Technology.
Keith M Vogt1 University of Pittsburgh.
Lynne M Reder2 Carnegie Mellon University.
Carnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Research Training in Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineT32GM075770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YAN XU · 2007 to 2026
$4.8M
COMPUTATIONAL &BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES TO COGNITIONT32MH019983 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI REDER, LYNNE MARIE · 1998 to 2012
$2.6M
Task preparation abnormality in individuals with unipolar and bipolar depressionK01MH104348 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MANELIS, ANNA · 2015 to 2018
$626k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM075770NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH104348NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the neurobiological basis of temporal resetting, an aspect of temporal order memory, using a version of the delayed-match-to-multiple-sample task. While in an fMRI scanner, participants evaluated whether an item was novel or whether it had appeared before or after a reset event that signified the start of a new block of trials. Participants responded "old" to items that were repeated within the current block and "new" to both novel items and items that had last appeared before the reset event (pseudonew items). Medial-temporal, prefrontal, and occipital regions responded to absolute novelty of the stimulus-they differentiated between novel items and previously seen items, but not between old and pseudonew items. Activation for pseudonew items in the frontopolar and parietal regions, in contrast, was intermediate between old and new items. The posterior cingulate cortex extending to precuneus was the only region that showed complete temporal resetting, and its activation reflected whether an item was new or old according to the task instructions regardless of its familiarity. There was also a significant Condition (old/pseudonew) × Familiarity (second/third presentations) interaction effect on behavioral and neural measures. For pseudonew items, greater familiarity decreased response accuracy, increased RTs, increased ACC activation, and increased functional connectivity between ACC and the left frontal pole. The reverse was observed for old items. On the basis of these results, we propose a theoretical framework in which temporal resetting relies on an episodic retrieval network that is modulated by cognitive control and conflict resolution.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsPattern Recognition, VisualReaction TimeTime PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28294716
PMCPMC5653970
OpenAlexW2603406902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.