Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28294479›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

Understanding advance care planning within the South Asian community.

Patricia D Biondo, Rashika Kalia, Rooh-Afza Khan, Nadia Asghar, Cyrene Banerjee, Debbie Boulton, Nancy Marlett, Svetlana Shklarov, Jessica E Simon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advance care planning among stroke patients: A scoping review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia D BiondoAdvance Care Planning Collaborative Research and Innovation Opportunities Program (ACP CRIO), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Rashika KaliaPatient and Community Engagement Research Program (PaCER), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Rooh-Afza KhanPatient and Community Engagement Research Program (PaCER), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nadia AsgharPatient and Community Engagement Research Program (PaCER), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Cyrene BanerjeePatient and Community Engagement Research Program (PaCER), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Debbie BoultonPatient and Community Engagement Research Program (PaCER), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nancy MarlettPatient and Community Engagement Research Program (PaCER), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Svetlana ShklarovPatient and Community Engagement Research Program (PaCER), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jessica E SimonAdvance Care Planning Collaborative Research and Innovation Opportunities Program (ACP CRIO), University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is a process of reflection on and communication of a person's future health-care preferences. Evidence suggests visible minorities engage less in ACP. The South Asian ethnic group is the largest visible minority group in Canada, and information is needed to understand how ACP is perceived and how best to approach ACP within this diverse community.

objectiveTo explore perspectives of South Asian community members towards ACP.

designPeer-to-peer inquiry. South Asian community members who graduated from the Patient and Community Engagement Research programme (PaCER) at the University of Calgary utilized the PaCER method (SET, COLLECT and REFLECT) to conduct a focus group, family interviews and a community forum. SETTING AND

participantsFifty-seven community-dwelling men and women (22-86 years) who self-identified with the South Asian community in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

resultsThe concept of ACP was mostly foreign to this community and was often associated with other end-of-life issues such as organ donation and estate planning. Cultural aspects (e.g. trust in shared family decision making and taboos related to discussing death), religious beliefs (e.g. fatalism) and immigration challenges (e.g. essential priorities) emerged as barriers to participation in ACP. However, participants were eager to learn about ACP and recommended several engagement strategies (e.g. disseminate information through religious institutions and community centres, include families in ACP discussions, encourage family physicians to initiate discussions and translate materials).

conclusionsUse of a patient engagement research model proved highly successful in understanding South Asian community members' participation in ACP.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningPerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleAsia, WesternCanadaCommunicationCultural CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchadvance care planningminority groupspatient engagementpatient engagement researchqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28294479
PMCPMC5600224
OpenAlexW2593284111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.