ArticleBiometrics2017
Learning gene regulatory networks from next generation sequencing data.
Article in Biometrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Folic acid and sperm quality improvement: insights from snRNA sequencing and RNA splicing mechanisms.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Joint gene network construction by single-cell RNA sequencing data.Biometrics · 2023Article
- Kernelized multiview signed graph learning for single-cell RNA sequencing data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Precision machine learning to understand micro-RNA regulation in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Fast hybrid Bayesian integrative learning of multiple gene regulatory networks for type 1 diabetes.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Learning Moral Graphs in Construction of High-Dimensional Bayesian Networks for Mixed Data.Neural computation · 2019Article
- SILGGM: An extensive R package for efficient statistical inference in large-scale gene networks.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Article
- A Latent Gaussian Copula Model for Mixed Data Analysis in Brain Imaging Genetics.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) has gradually replaced microarray as the major platform in measuring gene expressions. Compared to microarray, NGS has many advantages, such as less noise and higher throughput. However, the discreteness of NGS data also challenges the existing statistical methodology. In particular, there still lacks an appropriate statistical method for reconstructing gene regulatory networks using NGS data in the literature. The existing local Poisson graphical model method is not consistent and can only infer certain local structures of the network. In this article, we propose a random effect model-based transformation to continuize NGS data and then we transform the continuized data to Gaussian via a semiparametric transformation and apply an equivalent partial correlation selection method to reconstruct gene regulatory networks. The proposed method is consistent. The numerical results indicate that the proposed method can lead to much more accurate inference of gene regulatory networks than the local Poisson graphical model and other existing methods. The proposed data-continuized transformation fills the theoretical gap for how to transform discrete data to continuous data and facilitates NGS data analysis. The proposed data-continuized transformation also makes it feasible to integrate different types of data, such as microarray and RNA-seq data, in reconstruction of gene regulatory networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.