Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28293791›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017

Pregnant women's awareness, knowledge and beliefs about pelvic floor muscles: a cross-sectional survey.

Anne-Marie Hill, Steven M McPhail, Judith M Wilson, Richard G Berlach

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04893005 (Knowledge Level of Pelvic Floor in Different Age Groups), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04893005 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Knowledge Level of Pelvic Floor in Different Age Groups

TypeobservationalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled1,215ConditionsPelvic Floor Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Awareness of urinary incontinence in pregnant women as a neglected issue: a cross-sectional study.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Marie HillSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6845. anne-marie.hill@curtin.edu.au.
Steven M McPhailCentre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Judith M WilsonSchool of Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Richard G BerlachSchool of Education, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
The University of Notre Dame Australia · AUCurtin University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPregnant women benefit from completing pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFMEs). The aims of the study were to evaluate pregnant women's levels of awareness, knowledge, and beliefs about the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and PFMEs.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted. Respondents were pregnant women over the age of 18 years who attended antenatal clinics in Western Australia (WA). Questionnaire items measured awareness and knowledge about PFMs, confidence and beliefs about engaging in PFMEs, and attendance at antenatal education (ANE) classes. Chi-squared tests examined potential associations between questionnaire items and respondent characteristics.

resultsMean gestation of respondents (n = 633 out of 850; 74% response rate) was 28.7 (+7.8) weeks and 50% were giving birth for the first time. Although 76% of respondents knew that PFMs can prevent urinary incontinence, only 27% knew that they prevented faecal incontinence and 41% thought it was normal to leak urine when pregnant. Only n = 72 (11%) were practicing PFMEs. Respondents who had attended ANE (28%) were significantly more knowledgeable about pelvic floor function (p < .001) and significantly less likely to believe that leaking urine during pregnancy was normal (p = 0.02), compared with those who had not attended ANE. Respondents who did not speak English at home (18%) were significantly less knowledgeable about PFMs and PFMEs, and significantly less likely to have attended, or planned to attend, ANE classes.

conclusionPregnant women require more health education regarding PFMs. Education should be provided using diverse modes, especially for women from migrant backgrounds and women who do not plan to attend formal ANE classes.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPelvic FloorPregnancyPrenatal EducationYoung AdultBehaviour change theoryPelvic floorPelvic floor exercisesPregnancySurvey

Identifiers

PMID28293791
OpenAlexW2597007415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.