Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28293782›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results.

Jan Boucek, Jan Vokral, Libor Cerny, Martin Chovanec, Jiří Skrivan, Eduard Zverina, Jan Betka, Michal Zabrodsky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Osia Implantation in Patients With Prior Craniotomy for Skull Base Tumors.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bone Conduction Implants for Hearing Rehabilitation in Skull Base Tumor Patients.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan BoucekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic. jboucek99@seznam.cz.
Jan VokralDepartment of Phoniatrics, The First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Zitna 24, 120 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Libor CernyDepartment of Phoniatrics, The First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Zitna 24, 120 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Martin ChovanecDepartment of ENT, The Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 50, 100 34, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Jiří SkrivanDepartment of ENT, The Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Eduard ZverinaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Jan BetkaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Michal ZabrodskyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skull base tumors and, in particular, vestibular schwannoma (VS) are among the etiological reasons for single-sided deafness (SSD). Patients with SSD have problems in understanding speech in a noisy environment and cannot localize the direction of sounds. Baha is one of the most frequently used systems for SSD compensation. Out of 38 patients with SSD after retrosigmoid removal of VS who underwent testing with Baha softband, 16 were satisfied and were indicated for Baha implantation. Two surgical approaches have been used-the Nijmegen linear incision technique with subdermal thinning (Group I, implant BI300) and fast surgery technique without subdermal thinning (Group II, implant BIA400). The duration of the surgery, the implant stability measured by Ostell, and skin or soft tissue reactions in long range follow-up were evaluated and compared between Group I and II. There was a difference in duration of surgery, in Group II procedures averaged significantly faster (p > 0.001). In both groups, there was a similar trend of the gradual increase of implant stability. In the Group I and II, there was comparable rate of the skin or soft tissue reactions grade 0, I, II, or III. We have proved Baha to be a suitable possibility for SSD patients after the removal of VS, regardless of the approach. After the retrosigmoid approach to the VS, the key step of Baha implantation must be to reach intact healthy bone to avoid implantation into scar tissue.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsHearing Loss, UnilateralNeuroma, AcousticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis ImplantationProsthesis RetentionTreatment OutcomeBahaImplant stabilityOstellResonance frequency analysisRetroauricular approachSingle-sided deafnessVestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.