Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28293770›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2018

The value of "en toto" globe submission in the assessment of high-risk retinoblastoma cases and staging.

Hind Manaa Alkatan, Hani ALBalawi, Azza M Y Maktabi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hind Manaa AlkatanDepartments of Ophthalmology & Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University-Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. hindkatan@yahoo.com.
Hani ALBalawiOphthalmology Department, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Azza M Y MaktabiPathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the importance of "en toto" globe submission in the assessment of high-risk pathological findings in retinoblastoma cases, aiming at identifying the additional value from full globe examination of enucleated eyes (including the calottes).

methodsRetrospective histopathological case series of eighty-one enucleated globes with the clinical diagnosis of retinoblastoma, histopathologically examined at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (KKESH) between January 2010 and December 2013. We included retinoblastoma eyes with any type of invasion (more than pT1) in which the globe was submitted "en toto." All cases were histopathologically classified according to the American Joint Cancer Classification (AJCC TNM classification, 2009 6th edition).

results81 enucleated globes were examined, out of which 30 globes were classified as high-risk cases (more than pT1). 8 cases had massive choroidal invasion in both the PO sections and calottes. 5 cases had focal choroidal invasion in both. One case has massive choroidal invasion in calottes with very superficial ON head invasion. Two cases were found to have focal choroidal invasion in the calottes with prelaminar ON invasion. In these three cases (10%), the presence of focal or massive choroidal invasion in the calottes has affected the classification.

conclusionsThis study consolidates the guidelines recommended in the consensus meeting: from the International Retinoblastoma Staging Working Group on the pathology guidelines for the examination and evaluation of prognostic risk factors in retinoblastoma eyes. Full globe submission and examination should be the routine accepted practice universally even in underdeveloped countries.

Indexed as

Eye EnucleationEyeFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaRetrospective StudiesHistopathologyRetinoblastomaTumor classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.