ArticleBioMed research international2017
Numerical Method for the Design of Healing Chamber in Additive-Manufactured Dental Implants.
Article in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Insertion Torque and Implant Stability of Two Different Implant Macrogeometries in the Initial Periods of Osseointegration.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Trial
- Influence of Immediate Versus Delayed Loading on Peri-Implant Bone Healing: A Comparative FEA Study of Titanium Threaded and Scaffold Dental Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early Osseous Proliferation in Spiraled Healing Chambers Resulted After the Insertion of Titanium Implants in Cortical Bone of a Rabbit.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- In Silico possibilities to understand peri-implant bone healing- state of the Art.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Review
- High Insertion Torque-Clinical Implications and Drawbacks: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The state of additive manufacturing in dental research - A systematic scoping review of 2012-2022.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Engineer design process assisted by explainable deep learning network.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Healing Pattern Analysis for Dental Implants Using the Mechano-Regulatory Tissue Differentiation Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Investigation of Bone Growth in Additive-Manufactured Pedicle Screw Implant by Using Ti-6Al-4V and Bioactive Glass Powder Composite.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Histological and Histomorphometrical Evaluation of a New Implant Macrogeometry. A Sheep Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Shape Optimization of Bone-Bonding Subperiosteal Devices with Finite Element Analysis.BioMed research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inclusion of a healing chamber in dental implants has been shown to promote biological healing. In this paper, a novel numerical approach to the design of the healing chamber for additive-manufactured dental implants is proposed. This study developed an algorithm for the modeling of bone growth and employed finite element method in ANSYS to facilitate the design of healing chambers with a highly complex configuration. The model was then applied to the design of dental implants for insertion into the posterior maxillary bones. Two types of ITI® solid cylindrical screwed implant with extra rectangular-shaped healing chamber as an initial design are adopted, with which to evaluate the proposed system. This resulted in several configurations for the healing chamber, which were then evaluated based on the corresponding volume fraction of healthy surrounding bone. The best of these implants resulted in a healing chamber surrounded by around 9.2% more healthy bone than that obtained from the original design. The optimal design increased the contact area between the bone and implant by around 52.9%, which is expected to have a significant effect on osseointegration. The proposed approach is highly efficient which typically completes the optimization of each implant within 3-5 days on an ordinary personal computer. It is also sufficiently general to permit extension to various loading conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.